Shredder

They don’t have to put timings on a roadmap at all, just a list of what they’d like to achieve, and an order in which they’d like to do it. Frankly I don’t even need that, a simple statement of the games direction and priorities would suffice.

They don’t have to put timings on a roadmap at all, just a list of what they’d like to achieve, and an order in which they’d like to do it. Frankly I don’t even need that, a simple statement of the games direction and priorities would suffice.

I remember and liked that post, it indeed gave the kind of steer I’m after, but that’s 6 months ago, and prior to release.

A statement reaffirming those aspirations would really help.

The game feels more empty without the additional planets. 

No word on missing planets? 

Then go to the unsafe asteroids. Simple.

I don’t think building sandbox games are for you.

I feel like there’s more important features to work on than transparent voxels, especially just before launch. All efforts should be on stability, bug fixing, polishing of FTUE etc.

The click bait title worked.
 
I like the idea, but they should also look to increase the weight  of the large shields so that it has a bigger impact on top speeds

Eve had terrible critics review for the first few years, but enough people picked it up through word of mouth and it thrived. Hopefully the same will happen here. But yeh there’s going to be plenty of bad reviews, mainly from the kids that are frustrated that the game didn’t deliver the full list of aspirations.
 
What I don’t know is how positive reviews offset bad ones on steam.

Safe zone is needed for Second Life activities. They can easily release in 2023 a new system without Safe Zones. Its not like they want but its needed. The majority population is PvE in DU and it will be PVE!

If there’s no sub, then there’s no guarantee of further content, without further content the game dies.

If there’s no sub, then there’s no guarantee of further content, without further content the game dies.

One slightly concerning comment that was made:  “we hope to only have to launch once” …….soooo there might be further wipes and launches?
 
I'm pro a wipe for a clean launch, but only if it’s confirmed to be persistent after that point. 

One slightly concerning comment that was made:  “we hope to only have to launch once” …….soooo there might be further wipes and launches?
 
I'm pro a wipe for a clean launch, but only if it’s confirmed to be persistent after that point. 

One slightly concerning comment that was made:  “we hope to only have to launch once” …….soooo there might be further wipes and launches?
 
I'm pro a wipe for a clean launch, but only if it’s confirmed to be persistent after that point. 

One slightly concerning comment that was made:  “we hope to only have to launch once” …….soooo there might be further wipes and launches?
 
I'm pro a wipe for a clean launch, but only if it’s confirmed to be persistent after that point. 

The one thing I like about this approach is it means NQ can set prices in the future, thereby making it possible to adapt as the economy changes. They have to have this flexibility as it’s impossible to get it right at the start, and future features will require further changes to prices.

Full wipe please.

I assume BPs will not be wiped, so I play to create them.

This. Please don’t call it flotilla, fleet or group, really anything else.

The world moved on, people pay to play alphas now. 

I assume BPs will not be wiped, so I play to create them.

Full wipe please.

Yeh I wasn’t aware schematics were hated, just the implementation. 
 
If schematics go, then something else needs to replace them. Maybe talent based efficiencies to encourage people
to specialise and use the market??