Jump to content

joaocordeiro

Alpha Tester
  • Content Count

    886
  • Joined

  • Last visited


Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from GraXXoR in @NQ - Multiboxing?   
    How about you read the post again instead of saying BS above your player paygrade... 
    Ppl can use multiple accounts at the same time as long as does not mess up the anti-cheat - > not on the same computer... 
     
     
    PS: current players getting multiple subscriptions is probably a economical "must" at this point. 
  2. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from GraXXoR in Will this be another Cyberpunk 2077 disaster?   
    Lol. 
     
    I wish this was like cyberpunk. 
    Cyberpunk only failed on releasing the game full of stupid small bugs. 
    But it is still a great game. 
    I was lucky to get it for pc(the least buggy version) 
    And yes i saw all sorts for bugs and crashes. Had to save every 30 secs to make sure a game bug would not roll me back 2 hours. 
    And i was kind of disapointed with the damage system. But then i found out about hacks and it kind of compensated. 
     
    That said, cyberpunk is a dramatic masterpiece. 
    The city colors, the quests rich with story, the horror, the hope, the rage, the sadness, the joy. 
    At the end of game i felt like i lost a close friend.
    (I definitely recommend ppl to play it for the story) 
     
    What does DU have to compensate the bugs?
    Does it have story? Quests? Hope? Joy? 
    Does it make us feel something besides boredom or grief? 
  3. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Deintus in Will this be another Cyberpunk 2077 disaster?   
    Lots of ppl betting on that. But can designing pretty voxel ships be a lasting objective?
    What ever the answer is, its not my type of game. I like to feel rewarded emotionally when i make a good decision on a game. I dont feed on other ppl grief to get satisfaction. 
  4. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from DarkAster in Anti-gravity script   
    You need to link the agg to the PB and rename that to "agg" 
  5. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Ryotian in “Marketplace Heist” Response   
    Here are my 2 cents:
     
    We can all find excuses and exceptions to try to justify this, but at the end, the abusers knew they were destroying an important admin construct. They knew.
     
    We have seen ppl testing the limits of NQ for months now. We have seen NQ giving a final warning to those ppl testing the limits. 
     
    Should it be a perma ban? Maybe not. But someone had to be the example for players to understand that this is beta. Bugs and exploits are still common and beta testers need to know the boundaries of what they can and should be doing. 
     
     
    Want to be on the safe side? Dont overexploit a bug.... 
    Capture a recording of a small use of the exploit, upload it to YouTube, set it as "not listed" and open a support ticket with it. 
  6. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Ater Omen in “Marketplace Heist” Response   
    We dont know the full context. 
     
    In how many previous explois have those same players participated? 
     
    Have all of them been banned? If not, what was the criteria? 
     
    All we have seen was NQ saying they have seen 100% intention againt rules and reacted, and some ppl saying "poor me, im banned" 
    But does that count as context? 
  7. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from vertex in “Marketplace Heist” Response   
    We dont know the full context. 
     
    In how many previous explois have those same players participated? 
     
    Have all of them been banned? If not, what was the criteria? 
     
    All we have seen was NQ saying they have seen 100% intention againt rules and reacted, and some ppl saying "poor me, im banned" 
    But does that count as context? 
  8. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from vertex in “Marketplace Heist” Response   
    Here are my 2 cents:
     
    We can all find excuses and exceptions to try to justify this, but at the end, the abusers knew they were destroying an important admin construct. They knew.
     
    We have seen ppl testing the limits of NQ for months now. We have seen NQ giving a final warning to those ppl testing the limits. 
     
    Should it be a perma ban? Maybe not. But someone had to be the example for players to understand that this is beta. Bugs and exploits are still common and beta testers need to know the boundaries of what they can and should be doing. 
     
     
    Want to be on the safe side? Dont overexploit a bug.... 
    Capture a recording of a small use of the exploit, upload it to YouTube, set it as "not listed" and open a support ticket with it. 
  9. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from MopnexAndreyno in “Marketplace Heist” Response   
    We dont know the full context. 
     
    In how many previous explois have those same players participated? 
     
    Have all of them been banned? If not, what was the criteria? 
     
    All we have seen was NQ saying they have seen 100% intention againt rules and reacted, and some ppl saying "poor me, im banned" 
    But does that count as context? 
  10. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from killthrush in Why should i play this game?   
    Its not up to us to convince you to play the game. If you cant find a reason on your own, dont play. 
  11. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Zamiel7 in Not Punishing Desolation was weak and poor from NQ   
    This is 100% BS. Here and in real life. 
    Justice is applied against a crime, one case at each time. 
    And you definitely do not need to be 100% just to apply justice at one case. 
     
    Sure we want all exploiters to have some sort of consequence for exploiting. But punishing one exploit has nothing to do with another exploit. It only has to do with the consequences his exploiting caused to others. 
     
    One case at each time we must evaluate and apply justice. 
  12. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Ven in PvP is Broken aka Pay to Win   
    Well he does have a point in XS weapons being 100% useless with current meta. 
    Those XS weapons should have a huge disadvantage but not 100% useless. 
     
    But its definitely not "pay to win" . More like "socialize to win" 
  13. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Fallen Angel in Why should i play this game?   
    Its not up to us to convince you to play the game. If you cant find a reason on your own, dont play. 
  14. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from HairballHacker in Why should i play this game?   
    Its not up to us to convince you to play the game. If you cant find a reason on your own, dont play. 
  15. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Heidenherz in Why should i play this game?   
    Its not up to us to convince you to play the game. If you cant find a reason on your own, dont play. 
  16. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Mordgier in Why should i play this game?   
    Its not up to us to convince you to play the game. If you cant find a reason on your own, dont play. 
  17. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Mordgier in PvP is Broken aka Pay to Win   
    again, that was on the context of presenting a anti-cheat program........
  18. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Mordgier in PvP is Broken aka Pay to Win   
    You do understand that that was written in the context of an anticheat program right?
    All that says for sure is that running multiple instances of DU on the same computer is not allowed (mainly because the anticheat cannot support it)

    @blazemonger Said in another topic that playing in different computers has been cleared as allowed. But I would love for @NQ-Naerais to clear if this restriction also applies to different computers.
  19. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from GraXXoR in NQ, Griefers are a problem   
    The extreme is not subjective. When you dig a wall, without any construct or any other reason, in front of a landing strip. You are objectively being a dick.
    The border between being a dick and not being a dick can be subjective. That's why NQ is doing the ruling case by case.
  20. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from GraXXoR in NQ, Griefers are a problem   
    As a general rule, I agree with you. Specially in RL.
    But well-defined rules are only a requirement for must have game mechanics. Stuff that you need to do, in the daily based to play the game.
    Like stop on the red sign.
     
    But most things in life and some in game are not well-defined. Here are some examples:
     
    "Spraying paint in to a surface"
    There is no law that prevents you from spraying paint into a surface.
    But if you do it in a way that damages stuff that is not yours there is.
    But if that stuff has no value, like dirt, or stray plants, it's ok.
     
    "Damaging a vehicle that belongs to someone else"
    Everyone will say that the owner will be entitled to compensation.
    But what is "damage"?
    If I have butter on my fingers and live a mark on the surface, should I pay for a full paint?
    If the vehicle is parked in the middle of the highway, should I be responsible?

    In all cases in RL, a judge is required to interpret the law in that situation. Calculate the responsibility and the damages. Only after that, a rule can be applied.
     
    Computer game are somewhat more easy to regularize. Because game mechanics have a limited number of outcomes in each action. So players assume that it is possible to create rules that cover the entire gameplay. It is not possible.

    In this case digging dirt is allowed. While griefing players with blocking wall is not.
    But what is a griefing wall? How many meters? How far away from the other territory?
    Should NQ come up with a 5 variable equation?

    But the problem is not the height of the wall. It's the "damage" it is causing to another player.

    If the 2 players are ok with having a 100m wall dividing their territory, there is no issue in doing one.
    But if one player feels like his gameplay was griefed he has the right to open a complaint.

    NQ will look at his arguments and annalise his suffered "damage".
    Then NQ will go to the player that caused the situation and ask for why the player did that.
    If the player has a decent justification, like "L was leveling terrain for my L core" then NQ may try to find another solution, like offering a free TCU to the "offended"
    If it was pure griefing. NQ may take action against the griefer.

    For anyone doing digs and platforms from dirt. All you need to know is that you should get along with ppl around you.
    If possible, don't block access to his stuff.
    If you feel like he will not like it, go ask his opinion 1st.
    If you really need to do it, try to make a deal with him.

    For anyone attempting to make a complaint to NQ.
    Try talking to the guy 1st, make sure he knows he is creating a problem to you.
  21. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Emptiness in Leaving safe zone is consenting to PvP.   
    You see it as 1 fault. And you think that justifies everything. 
    I see 2 ppl. 
    1 - a noob in despair, just hoping for a miracle.
    2 - a sadist ignoring any tactical advantage of a quick robbery and move away. And staying there just feeding out of the noob despair.
     
    The noob is putting his hopes in the wrong logic and will be fustrated. 
    The sadist is a person with very low moral standards wating for a quick rush. 
  22. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Emptiness in Leaving safe zone is consenting to PvP.   
    Moral value still apply. 
    And some types of pvp, even if allowed, still show your low moral values. 
  23. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Anderson Williams in Leaving safe zone is consenting to PvP.   
    Moral value still apply. 
    And some types of pvp, even if allowed, still show your low moral values. 
  24. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Sarogahtyp in Greifers   
    I belive that a player should be able to opt out of any part of the game, if he is willing to suffer the desavantage. 
    Ppl should to opt-out crafting and industry, if they are willing to buy stuff at the price it exists. 
    Ppl should be able to opt-out pvp if they dont mind being stranded on a safezone waiting for freight ships to sell them the high tier ore they need. 
     
    The pvp free zones serve 2 proposes 
    1 so ppl can have 1 tile to park their constructs. 
    2 so new players can have a start without being immediately shot down. 
     
    Having 1 single sanctuary moon already serves this propose. 
    I do think the starter area should be alioth and all its moons. But i dont agree with pvp free zones in every planet. 
  25. Like
    joaocordeiro got a reaction from Moosegun in Base Location Problem - Looking for suggestions   
    I guess its impossible to fight this.
    Even in our org, some new members say they want to have their own industry from the nanopack. Even though we can provide them with free L engines. 
    As the time passes and ppl get more experience in the game, they learn how much time they are wasting..
     
    But thats the only thing they need to chance. Time. 
×
×
  • Create New...