-
Posts
394 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
backer_title
Patron
-
Alpha
Yes
Recent Profile Visitors
2463 profile views
Physics's Achievements
-
Physics reacted to a post in a topic: DUAL UNIVERSE: WHAT'S COMING NEXT
-
OP seems to of put in a fair amount of time to make a guide and all you want to do is shit on it with ramblings. Go away and get some manners and respect. If you want to have a moan and and a rant make your own thread and not shit on someone else's efforts. Thank you Msoul for the time you put in to the guide 👍
-
OrionSteed reacted to a post in a topic: Why DU's PVP isn't as fun as pre-shields.
-
Zeddrick reacted to a post in a topic: Mission Running - Quanta Explosion again
-
Honvik reacted to a post in a topic: Mission Running - Quanta Explosion again
-
Make it so the more packages you have, the further away you can be seen 🍿
-
NQ, are you removing shopping bots from T1?
Physics replied to Messaline's topic in General Discussions
Bots should refresh, if they are not expect them to be fixed ASAP. -
Alvalor reacted to a post in a topic: HEXTEK Announcement
-
Strumfex reacted to a post in a topic: HEXTEK Announcement
-
Apologies for my tone but this post has really annoyed me. The Karen's here are entitled to cry and moan all they want but threats and harassment is an absolute f***ing no. Please report any of these activities because these players needs to be gone.
-
Physics reacted to a post in a topic: Could someone please shed some light on something.
-
KICKSTARTER DIGITAL REWARDS ARE COMING! - discussion thread
Physics replied to NQ-Wanderer's topic in General Discussions
so about that backer res node / skin? -
Launch is coming! So will be the boobians 👻
- 144 replies
-
- band of outlaws
- mercenary
-
(and 9 more)
Tagged with:
-
Ask Aphelia Episode #11 - Discussion Thread
Physics replied to NQ-Nyota's topic in General Discussions
HQ tile or not when a sub goes inactive the server will start the 90 day decay timer on the accounts constructs that is not on its matching sanctuary tile. That is how it is now so adding the HQ TCU with that makes little difference to your argument. -
I agree with this rather than removing the destruction. Additionally voxel was mentioned a few times. No imo it's actually stupid voxel is uneffected by the impact damage spheres. What NQ should do is make voxel become vaunable to impact damage formulas and make it act just like weapons fire. With this you could give PVE builders a taste of building with voxel damages in mind. Currently when a ship impacts an object a formula is run to determine the damage. A damage sphere originating from the point of impact expands until it eats the HP of elements determined from the formula. If Voxel played a role PVE builders would have more use of higher tier voxel because it could be made to have more impact resistance and HP to absorb that impact damage sphere. Additionally landing gears have their roles. If an impact damage sphere starts at a landing gear the damage formula currently gets a reducer and you don't get near as much damage. When will we see higher tier landing gears with bigger impact cushioning properties?
- 15 replies
-
- dynamic constructs
- decorative elements
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Physics reacted to a post in a topic: Decorative Items: Non-Destructible
-
Physics reacted to a post in a topic: Questions on Blue Print and Schematics.
-
blazemonger reacted to a post in a topic: Ongoing Discussions
-
I actually agree with many points here. NQ needs to drop a pair and just announce the obvious. Blueprints are a given exemption from any wipe (Blueprint snapping is a must have before any wipe also). Talent point retention is the sweetner. Pretty much anything else needs the delete key and have done with it all. Anyone trying to vocally keep their horded crap (I have billions worth of schems and other stuff also) without caring about the wider picture of the game just needs to shut up and NQ needs to hurry up and get this announcement over and done with. As for this Schematic removal idea NQ mentioned I'm a bit concerned on that. That would mean harsh gating on resources to balance it all out. Kinda like the current plasma gating but this would go all the way down the tiers and maybe even harsher.
-
Shaman reacted to a post in a topic: Voxel and Venting : What does the Game Design team think ?
-
Physics reacted to a post in a topic: Need to make official complaint about a GM
-
NQ-Nyota reacted to a post in a topic: An Egg-cellent Adventure Wrap Up!
-
Keep the events coming Nyota 👍
-
The longer these "discussions" go on the more worried I am that NQ will choose to move away from an economic wipe and taint the game in to release candidate. This will cause more damage down the road. The time to avoid a full economic wipe was months ago. That window has long since past. I agree with most here. Rip the damn bandaid. Blueprints are a red line. Talents are a sweetner.
-
Knight-Sevy reacted to a post in a topic: Voxel and Venting : What does the Game Design team think ?
-
Physics reacted to a post in a topic: Voxel and Venting : What does the Game Design team think ?
-
Physics reacted to a post in a topic: Voxel and Venting : What does the Game Design team think ?
-
Voxel and Venting : What does the Game Design team think ?
Physics replied to Knight-Sevy's topic in General Discussions
I'm going to bite tounge on my thoughts on this subject for now and just say thank you for the response Entropy. I'll always applaud the dev team jumping in direct communication like this. Keep it coming mate! -
Googled sandbox mmo while missing Star wars galaxies.
-
Physics reacted to a post in a topic: PTS feedback for the FTUE - thank you
-
PTS feedback for the FTUE - thank you
Physics replied to NQ-AntiGravitas's topic in General Discussions
First I would like to say big thank you AntiGravitas for reaching out. It does mean a lot to everyone when NQ talks about feedback, plans and ideas with the community direct. Keep it coming! 😁 There was a fair bit of concern prior to Athena on how NQ would tackle the FTUE because this for sure is one vital part to making Dual Universe successful. Once tested I can say from my personal point of view there was a fair amount of relief. The new FTUE path and design is hands down far, far better than what it was previously and also from players I personaly talk too they also overall felt very positive towards the new version. For the work and effort put in to the FTUE so far it's a job well done! 👍 Blaze in his way has raised a good point I also agree with in that Talent selection should be part of the golden path. Because the FTUE is so important for player retention I do also have some nit picking thoughts but they are not related to the golden path it's self. You will always be limited on haven to your personal tile so easy access and progression to Alioth should be a smooth transition as possible. Some newbie tiles are a fair distance away from that Alioth access. We want to avoid new players having them moments of stalling and thinking what they can do next as much as possible. Not just related to FTUE the surface rocks on Alioth once a player has reached there should have larger rock clusters to hunt and explore for on their hovercrafts. 20L surface rocks everywhere is a very boring way to gain initial resources. The thrill is in the hunt and discovery! This method of surface harvesting should be on all planets imo and offer a chance to find all tiers of rock clusters in their respective rarity. -
Blueprints still not useable to build larger structures
Physics replied to Mncdk1's topic in General Discussions
Does anyone read announcements anymore? " Keep in mind, if the above solution is decided on, that an improved version of the Blueprint / Construct deployment tool available to all players will be implemented in-game at the time (or maybe even before) such a solution would be applied to the game. Such improved version will enable players to have: A preview of the Construct before deploying the said Construct from a blueprint (this feature should be available with Athena release). An ability to auto-align the preview of the Construct on an already deployed Construct (this feature should be available a bit later after Athena release)." I guess it's more fun to just complain blind also.