Lethys

Dont worry. They never listen, so everything is fine for release

Smh, the next guy with a ready player one syndrome ?‍♂️

when will NQ finally adress the VERY useless UI for talents? you need to click 4 billion times to spend all your 88,8 million SP. that's ridiculous. And it's been that way since alpha 1. 
 
GL and HF spending those folks, I certainly won't

You're obviously a bit new around here....this idea that the devs will read feedback and then act on it is certainly well-intentioned, but this simply isn't something that NQ does. 
 
There's 6 years of history, here, where NQ rarely interacts with feedback (never mind acting on it).
 
This isn't a complaint about them not "doing what players say", it's just a statement of fact that almost all communication is one-way...so the chance that they'll read this idea and consider implementing it is basically zero. 
 
IMO, the UI/UX in this game needs some major overhauls in general. It still looks like the UI was improvised by the dev team -- UI/UX is important because it helps players learn the game and presents the game as being professional instead of looking like it was thrown together in a basement. 

Ehh.. folders for constructs and bookmarks.. It's not like we asked for it from day 1 ..

All boils down to working servers. Which doesnt work as intended. Which IS why Du will forever be restricted, because it doesnt work properly. When (IF) Nq ever gets it to work, du may have a chance 

All boils down to working servers. Which doesnt work as intended. Which IS why Du will forever be restricted, because it doesnt work properly. When (IF) Nq ever gets it to work, du may have a chance 

All boils down to working servers. Which doesnt work as intended. Which IS why Du will forever be restricted, because it doesnt work properly. When (IF) Nq ever gets it to work, du may have a chance 

Personally I have no intention on playing as i dont know when or if they plan to wipe. Not going to play if they wipe in a week or 2 kinda deal.
So my plan i to just set +300day of training an leave the +80mill xp in the bank

when will NQ finally adress the VERY useless UI for talents? you need to click 4 billion times to spend all your 88,8 million SP. that's ridiculous. And it's been that way since alpha 1. 
 
GL and HF spending those folks, I certainly won't

when will NQ finally adress the VERY useless UI for talents? you need to click 4 billion times to spend all your 88,8 million SP. that's ridiculous. And it's been that way since alpha 1. 
 
GL and HF spending those folks, I certainly won't

when will NQ finally adress the VERY useless UI for talents? you need to click 4 billion times to spend all your 88,8 million SP. that's ridiculous. And it's been that way since alpha 1. 
 
GL and HF spending those folks, I certainly won't

when will NQ finally adress the VERY useless UI for talents? you need to click 4 billion times to spend all your 88,8 million SP. that's ridiculous. And it's been that way since alpha 1. 
 
GL and HF spending those folks, I certainly won't

when will NQ finally adress the VERY useless UI for talents? you need to click 4 billion times to spend all your 88,8 million SP. that's ridiculous. And it's been that way since alpha 1. 
 
GL and HF spending those folks, I certainly won't

when will NQ finally adress the VERY useless UI for talents? you need to click 4 billion times to spend all your 88,8 million SP. that's ridiculous. And it's been that way since alpha 1. 
 
GL and HF spending those folks, I certainly won't

Funny how Carebear and butthurt get ppl to think they need to write smth while at the same time griefers is A-OK. 
 
Not to mention that the daphne comment has nothing worth to say either, but thats obviously ok too.
 
 
Smh some ppl

Carebears are bad at everything.

I generally do not appreciate the broadstroke labelling of players but in this case I'd make an exception. The instigator here really seems hellbent on making her quite narrowminded opinion heard in a provicative and generally ego-centric way, even when it has absolutely no relevance to the topic at all. She pretty much asks for the response she gets. That does not make either side right and it's kind of amusing to see how some will just jump on the bandwagon and take the bait, especially when their MO is pretty much identical.
 
And yes, it seems that NQ has no issue with this at all as they allow the likes of these to juist continue their antics and so we see a good example of a two people who are very similar but on opposite sides of the coin talk to their respective mirrors.

And then there is @Lethys who just fans the flames  .. I do agree with his point here though. You can't judge one side without also judging the other as both are equally guilty of the same thing here really.

yeah yeah, salty carebears claiming to be butthurt....again. gtfo

yeah yeah, salty carebears claiming to be butthurt....again. gtfo

they cant even get the server to work properly when there are just constructs around. this would not end well when the whole thing moves..... they simply can't do it and won't do it for exactly those reasons

But I like that NQ focus that. They giving us a blaster would also make me very happy.

I'm still having fun, but I do suppose it is probably just annoying everyone else at this point with this thread continuing. My apologies for that, I will wrap up my part and we can let better ideas bury this one at the bottom of the list.
 
 
Which counter your are referencing? Is it the one where you ignore any reason anyone else gives you about how this is a bad idea and claim that you deserve a WMD to 1-shot other people's ships with because you don't want to fit other weapons? Or the one where you call someone a pirate without any regard to their actual engagement in piracy because you think they don't like being called that? The second was me leading you in to showing that you know the first is wrong, and that you'd rather insult your opponents until they go away because you cant properly refute their arguments in a logical manner. This thread is well past done, and I won't play with you in it any more because it has occurred to me that its continuation is just annoying other people on the board, but if you want to keep posting, you may as well take the time to clarify which counter you are referencing. 
 
 
I will admit, you got me there, I let auto-correct adjust things to say "play your employees" instead of "pay your employees". I will correct this in the post you referenced.
 
Food for thought though, you obviously know what I meant or you wouldn't have called yourself an employer, you should probably also try explaining why you cant pay in-game employees to defend you from pirates instead of just trying to distract from that concept by pointing out spelling/grammatical problems.
 
 
We've been over this, it is called risk. Greater risks bring greater reward, and it is entirely your fault if you choose to give them that reward without that risk.  
 
 
You should ask that question again while looking in a mirror. I am a mission runner, the person that pirates are trying to blow up and take everything from. If this were about me wanting something for myself, should I not then agree with you? I've considered this quite thoroughly, probably a lot more than it deserves, and having looked at it long and hard from every point of view I could think of I've concluded that there is no way this idea as you have described it isn't a bad one.
 
But since you insist on my selfishness: I have flown more than 150 missions through pvp space, never once having fired a shot, never once getting shot at, all of them so clear of any pirate interference that I have on occasion flown them at low and easily catchable speeds just so that I would have the time to go to work, or to movies, or to run errands for hours on end. Your wmd wont affect my gameplay directly either way. It will however affect it indirectly by alienating the pvp crowd, chasing off players that I could enjoy interacting with, and that would subsequently stop paying subscriptions that help keep the game I like going. So, I can't say my intentions are totally and absolutely clear of self-interest, but of the two of us I seem to be the one that doesn't want to drive out an entire section of the game's player-base just to remove a small bit of risk from my own gameplay, so maybe you should go have a chat with that mirror again. You don't need a weapon who's only purpose is to take other players fun out of the game just because you don't like them playing in a way they are supposed to be able to play. 
 
Your initial post asks for a weapon that guarantees instant 100% loss on the part of all parties, no salvage, no loot, no recovering your ship later, the weapon just deletes everything in its blast radius from the game without regard as to what it was doing or how it was or was not involved, hostile or otherwise. Both PvE and PvP players have told you how and why this is overpowered, unnecessary, and bad. Its only purpose is malicious and you know it, and you are wrong for continuing to push it as you have, not that anyone will do anything about it.
 
So, much fun as I am still having, we've annoyed everyone long enough with this thread's continuation. Make your final post if you must, I'll still read it, but it is long past time this bad idea stopped distracting from better ones and was left ignored at the bottom of the thread list, so don't expect a response. 

Heard the whole "we will improve our communication" thingy before. Don't believe you a single word
 
Also: what IS the underlaying mechanic of taxes and the interconnection? See thats why your communication sucks. You actually don't communicate by saying lots of stuff
 
 

Heard the whole "we will improve our communication" thingy before. Don't believe you a single word
 
Also: what IS the underlaying mechanic of taxes and the interconnection? See thats why your communication sucks. You actually don't communicate by saying lots of stuff