Forodrim

I would argue that the incentive to keep it in one piece should:
- building a (large) new ship is difficult, as in it takes time and resources
- it works as it is
 
modern ship are also not kept in one piece because they get better over time and I think DU should aim for realism. 

no, show me where I said that. You seem to have serious problems to understand what I said. 
 
nope
source:
http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2013/space-human-body/
 
Where are your sources? 

nope, force is needed to change momentum.
in your example you are wildly mixing newtonian force and stuff like the weak force. 
=> a = F * (a/F)
=> a = a 
=> shocking! 
nope, HEAT is a type of warhead. Can be used as shell (fired by a tank (russian BK14 shell) for example) or a missile (TOW missile for example)
 
 nope, not going to happen.
In space heat radiation is very limited, so you will not freeze. you will also not explode. 
Death in space will occur by suffocation. 
 
=> just in the other thread in which you claimed a modern carrier does fire cruise missiles you mostly have no idea what you are talking about but like to hear yourself talk
=> consider yourself ignored. 

Edit: I will also start to report your posts since you continue to derail almost every discussion with your ramblings. 

nope, force is needed to change momentum.
in your example you are wildly mixing newtonian force and stuff like the weak force. 
=> a = F * (a/F)
=> a = a 
=> shocking! 
nope, HEAT is a type of warhead. Can be used as shell (fired by a tank (russian BK14 shell) for example) or a missile (TOW missile for example)
 
 nope, not going to happen.
In space heat radiation is very limited, so you will not freeze. you will also not explode. 
Death in space will occur by suffocation. 
 
=> just in the other thread in which you claimed a modern carrier does fire cruise missiles you mostly have no idea what you are talking about but like to hear yourself talk
=> consider yourself ignored. 

Edit: I will also start to report your posts since you continue to derail almost every discussion with your ramblings. 

JC answered that in the "ask me anything" video:
 
 

JC answered that in the "ask me anything" video:
 
 

I think your logo is not very wisely chosen, the added "wings" to the rune make it look like the emblem of various German Nazi groups (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odal_(rune)#Germany ). The original Odal rune itself is also used by the American "National Socialist Movement"

Universal naming standards just won't happen in DU, as you can already guess from this thread. Everyone has a different opinion and some (like me) won't use any common name at all.
 
All that matters (for buying, scouting enemies, ...) Are numbers. How many turrets, engines, acceleration, Mass, turning rate, which weapons, armor and so on. Only numbers will be accurate. Some word can't be, and will never be, accurate enough to describe ships

Wird Neu-Berlin einen funktionierenden Flughafen haben?

Wir bei Eisengrind haben nicht umsonst den BER Im Jahre 2528 nach nur dreijähriger Bauzeit endlich fertig gebaut. Wir bei Eisengrind wissen um die Bedeutung funktionierender Infrastrukturen und deshalb wird auch Neu Berlin einen modernen Raumhafen nach dem Vorbild des BER erhalten.

Wird Neu-Berlin einen funktionierenden Flughafen haben?

What I'm talking about is the mocking and continued harassment of players who are clearly in distress and pissed about what happened to them in game. 
As an example for the toxic mentality you can look at Mittanis harassment at a con of an player including the the statement "if you want to make the guy kill himself, his name is ....". That is no longer a playstyle.
how do you know? there is no information on how DU will handle PVP and looting  etc. The only thing we know so far is that NQ has stated that PVP and nonPVP playstyles will be viable. The EVE Players are the ones that go around claiming it will be free for all PVP / loot everything. 

construct to construct was rather low on their strech goal list, so I would be a bit surprised if that would be the main point of the game. DU will attract a different crowd than EVE and NQ will have to take that into account otherwise they will fail. 
 
I also kind of wonder why EVE players want to make DU into EVE 2.0? if you love EVE so much go back and play EVE. 

DU is set to be a game with PVP and non-PVP activities suitable for multiple playstyles. 
NQ will have to make sure that the toxic "harassment for teh lulz" mentallity that some EVE players have will not run rampant in their community. 

Not sure about that, what drove me off was the "if it is red it is dead" mentality that most players of EVE have. I mostly did exploration and relic and data sites in EVE, but that quickly became a mere game of hiding as PVP players thought an unarmed frigate would look good in their killboard. 
 
What surprises me is how many here just want DU to be a EVE clone, clones will never work. If DUs main playstyle will be a copy of EVE it will fail. Not because that playstyle is bad, but because it is a clone. 
 
DU must make sure that it will offer more and different playstyles than EVE. 

What bothered me I think, is that there was no concept of "neutrality" in EVE, you were either an ally or an enemy. Unknown, was automatically put into the enemy category. 
 
Yes, I really hope that the "explorer" playstyle is a bit expanded in DU as compared to EVE.