sHuRuLuNi
-
Posts
505 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by sHuRuLuNi
-
-
-
1 hour ago, Zarcata said:
I like green and can read it better on black than white. In addition, here should eh times some color in the forum, is already bad enough to endure the gray winter weather.
I use the Light Style, cannot stand white text on dark background (yeah, I know it's not so "gamers like", but neither am I) ... bue it's not like there is much to read now anyway, I just come by from time to time now ...
-
14 minutes ago, Knight-Sevy said:
Too bad for you but we will campaign for things to be done as it should be: An engine IN another engine must cause the 2 engines to be 100% obstructed.
Now ask yourself the real question, why don't you want this to happen ?
Either you are one of the cheaters moving Kt's of cargo in atmo while not paying the cost in time / fuel.
Or even worse you are one of the unscrupulous ship builders who sell these glitched ships.My ships, with a unique style btw, have no stacked elements. I never did that, nor I wanted to do.
Still, hardly anyone bought any BPs - all in all I sold maybe 6 or so BPs. Apparently the stacked ones got sold like cakes.
And that was the only thing which could interest ma at least a bit in the game (ship building), since everything else is meh .... I was waiting and hoping for it to change. It didn't. That's why I gave up, after 5 years. I cannot "leave" of course, since I am a Ruby Founder, but if this thing doesn't get completely overhauled or sold to a more capable developer, just as I said in my video, it will give its last breath rather sooner than later. -
2 hours ago, Peabody said:
=== Make planets rotate and revolve around the sun
There is no sun.
As for the rest: I am TIRED of hearing "ore", "mining", "asteroids", blabla .... all that sounds as if EVERYTHING ELSE in the game is already stellar. But there even is no game in the first place.
-
43 minutes ago, Physics said:
NQ could do much better by adding a rock size variety in to the game so experienced and new players can explore the land scape looking for more bountiful rocks / areas for bigger harvest pay outs.
But that is actual WORK. The developers would have to actually DEVELOP, create planetary FEATURES that make SENSE.
It is better to take the easy route in the form of a simple algorithm like "IF body = planet OR body = moon THEN SPAWN SAME CANDY EVERYWHERE" /s -
I have checked every hour or so today since ca. 4:00am (that is 11 hours ago) and all the time, there were just 31 to 32 Users online, of which half were "Guests" without a specific location which means they are probably Crawler Bots - so, there are at any given time some 7 registered Users online and maybe just as many "guests".
A forum which has at most 7 active users is not worth the webhosting cost. So, there is the chance for NQ to cut some more costs (i.e. the 5 dollars or so per month for the forum hosting) .... -
-
1 hour ago, Anopheles said:
Just off the top of my head. Nothing above is difficult to implement.
But ... but ... that would mean the developers would have to actually develop and not expect players to do their job? .... /wink --- see my YT Video
-
1 hour ago, Warlander said:
Well it makes it that more sad we are still using fossil fuels with no real clean energy, plasma, fusion, or anything sci-fi other than AGG, lazers, and some rudimentary teleportation.
I have suggested this many times over the years like in this post:
But of course it all gets ignored.
Boys just want to play the mining/money simulator and circle-jerk. As I said in my latest video: making money for the sake of making money - that's the whole game loop.
-
6 hours ago, Warlander said:
All of this needs to be changed and simplified to allow for faster travel and higher fuel costs to get there faster. Its like we are in the future 600 years and yet we are still relying on fossil, jet, and rocket fuel and somehow we went backwards in some regards.
600? Pff .... We are 10.000 (TEN THOUSAND) years in the future. The Novark landed on Alioth in the year 12477.
-
25 minutes ago, DasBier said:
NQ needs realy to play the game by self, this extrem market changes destroys progress of month.... and this total overpriced taxes, Nq come on, whats wrong with your calculation? Each child will tell u thats wrong and all in time have to mutch impact to a realy sensitiv game... u wanted to implement auto minign to safe performance and that player have more time for other stuff, good Thinkbase, but now very many in permanent stress to get they tiles paid....to sell there own stuff to get it paid. To say yeah u can go to sanctory is a big fail becouse sanctory is the unfriendliest and difficultiest planet.
and if u now plan to wipe your/our game is dead! THere mutch more People than the small group wo want a wipe.
u cant crash the economy like now.
what can you do ? placing bot ore buyer with higher buy prices, u still can lower it Month by Month but u need do something NOW.
New players and old now very restricted in what they can do...to earn money.
In my case i spend alot quanta before demeter to build up a good reserve and now i can only produce with a extremly lost...
Iam realy rarly use Forums but now i must speak! i help all the time new Player to find there way into the game, before demeter.
now the most of them stopped the game.
sry for my bad english but iam angry.
-
12 hours ago, XKentX said:
I am from the "make money and destroy things" group.
I quit too.
?
-
On 12/2/2021 at 9:56 PM, blundertwink said:
Unfortunately, DU doesn't really seem to understand game design basics and implements features based on what will save them money and what "seems cool" rather than approaching it as game design professionals.
Unfortunately, indeed.
-
6 hours ago, Underhook said:
OMG NQ you are going to cop some flack over this.
Do any of you Devs talk to each other???
If we claim a hex and put anything on it the tax applies after 3 days. Affectively we are paying tax in advance. Anybody who is currently mining on a hex they claimed after Demeter hit has already had to pay tax.
Making announcements that demonstrate that you do not know how your game works is not a good look and helps to explain why the many of the player base are currently upset.
Are you really surprised at this point?
-
-
I commend your efforts, but TBH I do not know why are you even trying anymore ....
-
So, those 2,5 lines of naught text? That is supposed to be the Newsletter from the CEO .... wow
-
What Newsletter?
I didn't get anything.
-
On 12/2/2021 at 1:20 PM, enjeyy said:
One thing though, please leave out survival mechanics like the constant need for food and water. Enviromental hazards by all means, like the need for a proper underwater or space equpment, but not the constant need for grind.
Yeah, I am all for that as well. I was more thinking of a need for shelter (for example from weather conditions), thus a place to rest and refill the energy, which in turn can be boosted by some food or drinks. And then maybe medicine as well (say after you fall down some 10m and are injured), which in turn needs ingredients to produce, and so on - just as I said, it would then all tie together nicely ...
-
18 hours ago, ADCOne said:
Also its very easy to enjoy a game 'without risk' but DU certainly has risk each time you fly in and out of an atmosphere something, which your video seems to have ignored....
No, I have not. I clearly said that apart from partial flight mechanics the rest seems nonsensical. That is also the sole reason I was able to hold on for so long, because I enjoyed building ships (unique, nice looking ships) and flying around in space. The "partial" comes into play when as I said there are flight mechanics, but other things related to them do not make much sense (like flying into space in an open cockpit, or the fact that you cannot use voxels to build wings/ailerons with functional lift, thus forcing you to use the boring looking elements which have remained the same SINCE PRE-ALPHA).
-
2 minutes ago, VandelayIndustries said:
When you really look at it, this comment has no substance other than trying to appear like they are unique or something. 90% of gamers move from game to game. Some for pvp, some for single player, some because their friends are playing a game, anything. Not many people play ONE game and do so for year straight, or many years. If anyone does they are in the vast minority. Even people who have a main game like when I played eve religiously, I still occasionally player other games.
Sure, but what he is saying is that they actually are an organized lobby who DOESN'T CARE about the game. They only want to destroy stuff - so they bombard the Developers and push them to add more and more PVP features, but once the developer does this - they leave and go to the next game.
So, the point is: they do not care about any other feature of the game and they do not care that by pushing their agenda they are actually destroying the game for everyone else. -
This comment from this lad speaks for itself I guess ...
-
10 minutes ago, Tional said:
Yes, yes I get it. But I saw the Thread in the General Forum where he wrote that we should post questions which will be answered in an Q&A. In that (original thread, this one here) there was no mention of Discord or link to the "announcement" thread or anything.
-
33 minutes ago, Tional said:
NQ-Nyzaltar
-
- Community Manager
- Location: France
- Alpha: Yes
Greetings Noveans,
Upon popular request from players, we will be holding a live, written Q&A session with the Novaquark Game Design team on Wednesday, December 1st at 15:00 UTC.
NQ-Kyrios, NQ-Entropy and NQ-Wave will be answering player questions during one hour on a dedicated channel on Discord.
-
NQ, it's time to bring PvE Ratting Aphelia Missions
in General Discussions
Posted
The oldest written record of the use of LOL in the contemporary meaning of "Laughing Out Loud" was from a message typed by Wayne Pearson in the 1980s on the Usenet.
Today, LOL almost means the antonym of its original use. And I also read it as "lol" (as a word, not letter by letter).