Jump to content

Lavayar

Alpha Tester
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    49

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • backer_title
    Patron
  • Alpha
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

971 profile views

Lavayar's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • Reacting Well Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

35

Reputation

  1. Lavayar
    Still nothing. Dead industry incoming
  2.    Lavayar reacted to a post in a topic: NEW SCHEMATICS - Discussion Thread
  3.    Maxim Kammerer reacted to a post in a topic: NEW SCHEMATICS - Discussion Thread
  4. Lavayar
    after patch ΠΆ1 and t2 product shematics copies still exist. I think NQ you don't get it. It's question of quantity of copies. It's about annoynoce. Running form smelter to smelter with pack of t1 copies At least make shematics copies like other resourses that can be pulled out of container. If you are so stubborn.
  5.    Moulinex reacted to a post in a topic: NEW SCHEMATICS - Discussion Thread
  6.    Shiromar reacted to a post in a topic: NEW SCHEMATICS - Discussion Thread
  7.    tobitege reacted to a post in a topic: NEW SCHEMATICS - Discussion Thread
  8.    Mncdk1 reacted to a post in a topic: NEW SCHEMATICS - Discussion Thread
  9.    Lavayar reacted to a post in a topic: NEW SCHEMATICS - Discussion Thread
  10.    Facial_Fracture reacted to a post in a topic: NEW SCHEMATICS - Discussion Thread
  11. Lavayar
    Shematics needed for t1 alloys. They have like 2 min cycle. NQ you are [filtered]ing kidding me. Fix this asap
  12. Lavayar
    I understand why this should be implemented. But 5 copy slots is nonsence. industrialists must have some self-sufficiency and not rely in every run on copies availability on market
  13. Lavayar
    OP you are wrong. Limitations is considered bad game design today. Only limit is time - 24 hours in a day
  14. Lavayar
    Same problem.
  15. Lavayar
    Same problem. Webview2 is piece of crap
  16.    Lavayar reacted to a post in a topic: Expansions for market landing pads
  17. Lavayar
    Good job
  18.    Lavayar reacted to a post in a topic: [Discuss] We've Heard You!
  19. Lavayar
    This will lead to overproducrion of items again. PvP occupies not big part of the game. Game needs ways to sink elements not only in PvP. Just fix your physics. It's not sustanible when whole ship blows up from hitting small rock.
  20.    Lavayar reacted to a post in a topic: Space Map with Warp Cell Calculator
  21.    Lavayar reacted to a post in a topic: Wishing NQ the best, Oh man this patch.
  22.    Lavayar reacted to a post in a topic: Wishing NQ the best, Oh man this patch.
  23.    Lavayar reacted to a post in a topic: Schematics
  24.    lucagrabacr reacted to a post in a topic: Making it Harder for Individual Players, Forcing Interdependencies Through Arbitrary Mechanics & The Overall Condescending Presumption That Comes With it Won't Kickstart "Civilization" - Stop This Top-Down Approach on Forcing Civilizations to Materialize
  25. Lavayar
    Nice cup of rage
  26. Lavayar
    Tying shematic prices to manufacture time is ridiculous. Not to mention that manufactoring time of some products are just ridiculous timewall. And now we have ridiculous paywall and timewall. And dont tell me about that it's MMO. No, it's bad gamedesign. Just watch some video from GDC EVE Devs thought that ridiculous paywall and timewall will save them from Titans and Supercarriers produsing like mad. But in the end this striked them hard.
  27. Lavayar
    The only valid example is EvE. And even EvE now is goingh through hard times in balansing sinks and faucets.
  28. Lavayar
    noob can make simple speeder by himself just after digging few nodes. this way at least he will lern few things about geme world. Not just mindlesly bying stuff from market.
  29. Lavayar
    Well said Devs must make powerfull foundation for game world first. Put maximum effords in things that makes whole game world running. Cosmetics can be done later. No matter how players want them here and now.
  30. Lavayar
    Standings shure. I think devs will add something like that as a part of RDMS system. But Security Status is not that simple question. Devs have their own view on players interactions including griefing. I would like to see what they are up to. Unfortunely SSin Eve did not prove itself. It works like bunch of band aids. We need new aproach. Old ones discredit themselfs
×
×
  • Create New...