Jump to content

Lethys

Alpha Tester
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5686

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Lethys

    Shower, Sink: Functionality: Visible Character Hygiene

    in Idea Box

    Posted

    If nothing is associated with that "dirty state" then it's only a "feature" for roleplayers (and tbh I dont really see any reason to roleplay that, but ymmv) and everyone else just ignores it. If some negative effects come with it then its just adds to the tedious parts of the game as it's just "one more thing you have to do" (go clean yourself) without adding anything.

     

    Thats why food mechanics ala "you have to eat every day to not die" are bad imho, as they dont add anything except chores 

    RE: Immediate update needed for Terraformers.

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    3 hours ago, teso91 said:

    @NQ-Naerais. I would happily choice a voice chat to exchanges verses. I think you guys need to make a channel for this. It would make Our collaboration as a community with the server just amazing.

    It would be more easy for me to explain this way.   Otherwise i could resort to the old faxing system.   It's up to your team how fast and which way they would like to communicate.

    I also have a few new questions about voxel placements ( dirt) according to new asteroid placements.

    Thanks PM Teso91-dsageneral91@gmail.com
    (Internal TXT from admin 952-XXX-XXX ( PM for data)

    Awwwwwwww, you Must be new here if you think NQ does any of that communication. Cute. 

     

    We've been there. We had that. It utterly failed in a quite spectacular way. So nope, they wont do it. And even IF they would do it, they'd just listen to you and then forget about it, even if it were valid points. We see this pattern for years now, NQ will not change 

    Concern about the future of the game

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    12 hours ago, shadowfyre2 said:

    full time pvp free for all and dealing with griefers

    those two are not the same thing and you know it. FFA pvp != griefer

     

    7 hours ago, shadowfyre2 said:

    I'm saying that the current state of the game is no fun to me because it's too focused on pvp. Pvpers keep saying that the games objective is pvp. I don't enjoy being forced into pvp all the time and the drop in subscribers seems to support my assessment. Pvp game don't survive long in the gaming industry without limitations on pvp so griefers don't ruin the fun and drive away clients. I'm not saying pvp should be taken out. But it does need limits or the game community will not grow. You can't force people to play. My experience with the current state of the game isn't fun for those non pvpers and I am concerned that I don't see much love for the non pvp gaming community in the roadmap. I'm also concerned that the developers are so focused on pvp that they took an aspect ment for mining and gave it to pvp by restricting t3 to t5 asteroids to pvp areas. The developers say they want to see massive space battles but that won't happen without a larger community. You won't have a larger community without the game appealing to more gamers. I've made my recommendations. I'm trying to make a better game.

    no it doesn't support your argument at all. subs drop because there is nothing to do, or because ppl are bored. or because schematics are a nightmare to them....you don't know why they leave. it's just your personal bias that you think it supports your argument, which is a logical fallacy.

     

    Again, pvp != griefers. don't conflate the two as they have NOTHING in common. If you constantly conflate those two then you constantly paint pvp players the wrong way

     

    As someone else pointed out earlier:

    PVP finally gets some attention after 7 YEARS and it needs WAY MORE than that as it still is a pretty boring and weak pillar of the game. Every other pillar and aspect of the game received way more attention and love than pvp - which is fine, because you first need a foundation first (and tbh that foundation is still not there but that's another topic).

     

    DU was always meant to be a FFA pvp game with the vast majority of the game being in the pvp zone - and only a small portion of it being in safe zones. Those got extended already, which is totally fine. All that pvpers ask is a fun game where conflict over ressources, politics, wars and interesting, engaging, emergent and fun gameplay prevails. Which can't happen when everybody can do everything in the safe zone.

    Concern about the future of the game

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    1 hour ago, shadowfyre2 said:

    Ore level is about type ore, ie hold, coal, etc. Quality is about purity. G

    So that coal found in the pvp area is better than coal found on alioth.  For example,  limestone made into x2 space fuel...limestone on alioth would make what's in the game now. But ore found on an Asteroid near ion could be of exceptional purity making fuel that gives an additional 50 to fuel efficiency when used. This way we keep risk vs reward  but allow t4 ore on asteroids in the safe area in more limited quantities 

    well that's what is there now, basically, too. some materials are only found in pvp zone. wouldnt change anything at all. because ppl who wage war in pvp will only ever use the more superior material instead of the low value ore found in safe zones. you know, just like now.

    Concern about the future of the game

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    11 hours ago, shadowfyre2 said:

    This is why I think they could add quality to the ore. Let the higher quality be in the pvp area. Let that higher quality produce better elements to make it worth the risk of going into pirate area, but let low quality,  but usable t3-t5 ore be in safe zones so the non pvpers aren't locked out of over half the game

    i dont get your point here. that's exactly what is ingame right now - with the T1-5 ore. doesnt matter if they rebrand it, or introduce new stuff. there will still be better ore in the pvp zone as in the safezone. doesn't change anything.

     

    besides: risk vs reward is crucial here and creates oppertunities for gameplay. dont want to risk mining in pvp zones? dont go there. and maybe someone else will take that risk and sell you that ore....for a higher price ofc.

    Atmospheric radar and space radar. Why can't we connect them both to the same chair?

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    6 hours ago, Noddles said:

    For the same reason we'll get different weapons in 3 years when atmo pvp is a thing. There doesn't need to be a different element set for each environment. They could just change the values as you move through the atmosphere and have actual object detection so they dont fire straight through objects. NQ never does things the smart way.

    silly you, that would actually be useful. NQ doesn't do useful

    Please support your DU content creators

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    On 7/16/2021 at 10:12 PM, Perry666 said:

    Please help support your DU content creators on you tube, twitch and whatever other platform you see fit. Give em a like, a follow a subscription if you can. The more people creating content for the game the better chance DU has of attracting new players. New players means more money for NQ Which will hopefully trickle down to us in faster, better and more updates for the game. Think big picture friends.

    No.

     

    Oh wait, I mean yes. It will be hilarious to watch when ppl realize that du doesnt work properly yet. Imagine all the salt 

×
×
  • Create New...