Sybily
-
Posts
80 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Sybily
-
-
well.... at least it's not a huge nerf like the .23 but honestly i don't think I'll be using missions that much. even the most profitable bot mission is only 9 mil to travel 700 su. I'm not sure the exact time but that's what roughy 6-7 hours? I don't see how going afk for 7 hours is fun but hey... like i said, at least it's not a huge nerf. If this is an alternative to make money, trying to save for say exotic weapon schematics (about 700 mil for a full line) would take about 544 hours of just slowboating (( 700 / 9) * 7 hour trip). I don't see how this is "bringing the fun back" to the game.
-
-
but they aren't doing the same thing over again, they just all sit on one ship while only having 1 account needed to fly the ship
-
This absolutely not fair. The advantage they get is absolutely ridiculous. at least before if you have 20 accounts, all you could do is queue more talents. You can't mine on 20 accounts so that never bothered me. But now.... I'm rather ticked off.
-
-
7 hours ago, IvanGrozniy said:
stem: scrap the Eve talents system (some things should really not be copied)
OMG THIS ^^^
-
being able to recycle damaged elements back into its parts might make more sense so that way you can actually loot something of some value... basically... if an element loses just 1 life its almost worthless.
-
On 8/29/2019 at 1:03 PM, Project_Icarus said:
Quick Idea here; a nanopack tool that allows you to 'pack up' a construct and place it in a linked container, store it all as a single unit (not separated into component elements, voxels, and etc), and then 'unpack' and deploy the construct when needed. NO fussing about dismantling it bit by bit. No messing with LUA configs and scripts when re-deploying it. Just a simple way to pick up, store, and place constructs with little effort.
(Also, until docking works reliably this would be pretty useful)
For the love of god, YES we need this!
-
On 8/8/2019 at 6:46 PM, BaileyVandenbroek said:
The idea would be to simplify city creation by making it easier to build streets without having to place hundreds of cores.
I'm all for this!
-
On 5/16/2019 at 10:47 PM, LeineDearg said:
My idea is to allow an organization to use Resource Tokens to pay it's members for helping the organization to grow. Basically the organization is in need of a large amount of resources, or a service, so the organization issues a quest(s) for parts of what ever good or service. Instead of paying in currency, the organization pays out in these resource tokens.
I love this idea!
I added my own view on the subject matter here:
-
Sybily is a new app on the android app store that has a different, yet more elegant approach to user privacy . It's main feature is in the varying levels of connections you have with people. Everyone starts off anonymous but as you interact with someone, you level up with that person. It serves almost like a reputation system but instead of a 'Global' reputation (like what reddit basically is), it's relative for each user based on their connections they have.
The privacy is not some sort of extra thing added on the side. Instead, with the leveling system, user privacy IS the function of the app.
That being said, I think social media can/should have a net positive effect on social interaction as long as its designed correctly. Sybily is a social platform that has the right idea IMO. It's worth checking out.
Here is the link:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sybily.client.android&hl=en_US
P.S.
I'm going to be playing DU when the servers are up so expect limited support during that time
-
39 minutes ago, Atmosph3rik said:
The concept of transporting goods is a big part of DU's gameplay. That would make it too easy to simply mail resources between planets.
There are some things that we might be able to send with in-game mail though. Like Blueprints, scan data, ect.
Good point, it wouldn't be viable unless it was players delivering the mail (could be a business)
-
Having tiers of wearable gear with different stats and looks just like WoW would be pretty cool too.
-
Having a mailbox system like WoW would be pretty cool too
-
Cool, looks a lot like World of Warcraft
-
This was a game I backed many years ago because of the ambitious ideas they mentioned.
However.... I think they're execution and implementation was way way off.
DU is light years ahead and I find it funny that I even backed that other game. Surprisingly though, VoidSpace is still being actively developed, just at a snails pace for such a primitive looking game.
-
Real life is completely unhinged from higher powers than ourselfs (depending on your religion or lack thereof). In spite of this, humanity has done pretty well evolving into a complex social structure that we are. The lack of rules to govern us are what gives the demand for rules which we create ourselves. This is the beauty of the real universe we live in.
Tweet from @jcbaillie https://twitter.com/jcbaillie/status/1071806930107142144
not sure how to quote from other threads...
https://board.dualthegame.com/index.php/topic/10110-kickstarter-ama-event-second-part/
QuoteWhy such a title for this game? Is there a secret entry somewhere for an anteverse? Dual Universe means two of them, right? A normal one and an antimatter one.
The name of the game is refering the well known concept of duality in mathematics: two entities are "dual" when they have a different form, but share the same functional structure. You can "map" one to the other. We like to think that DU could be the "dual" of the real world one day: another form, but the same core dynamics! Check this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duality_(mathematics) -
-
1 hour ago, Odendis said:
I'm all for civilization/nation building, but a means to enforce must be atleast granted by the game.
Absolutely disagree. Doing so would not allow meaningful emergent gameplay. If the game/NQ does this then there is no incentive for players to do it. What would be the point of organizations to focus on security or other government structures if the game gives it away for free? There aren't many companies in real life that sell air to breath because there's near infinite supply, thus no demand. The point of emergent gameplay is to give purpose to the things you do. There will be no purpose for a kind of government focused organization to exist if the functions are already provided by the game.
It would be inaccurate to think that player based enforcement mechanisms would be less effective than one built in game because players can offer a human touch, whereas game logic cannot. Sure a finite number of things can be enforced by the game but there is no way game logic could possibly understand abstract/complex kinds of contracts/quests that players might come up with.
- Borb_1 and killthrush
-
2
-
Everything about what I was talking about won't be "explicit" functions offered by the game. I'm talking about dynamic civilizations that will be bootstrapped entirely by players. A government becomes a government because players cohesively organize together provided there is a demand for a government with enforcement mechanisms. And means of enforcement are not built in as a function of the game , but rather players themselves enforce the rules they themselves create. They will enforce a set of rules principally because they have the power to do so (i.e. more military/firepower that is sustained through government funding).
-
6 hours ago, SGCam said:
They talk about RDMS more in a few other places, including one of their dev vlogs. I agree it isn't clear at this point how to apply it to being a quest board or the like, but they are planning to make RDMS THE management tool for the game. I think players will make systems like quest boards and reputation systems work using the tools NQ provides.
Regardless, its a civilization building game- if you don't trust that the person giving the quest will compensate you, then don't take their quest. I expect reputation will be worth its weight in gold.
A quest or job can be abstract in its nature making it near impossible for enforcement to exist as rules of the game. That being said, some form of abstract work related contracts can still be made enforceable and can be done entirely by players without NQ involvement by means of enforcement bodies. A government like organization would have some form of judicial system where claims can be made. The government organization would also have some sort of policing to uphold and make enforceable, contracts made between citizens/other organizations, within the jurisdiction of said government. For such a concept to exist and function, citizens would need to pay a tax to the government in return for legal or any other types of protection from that government.
Trust is a key point. Citizens need to trust the government to act honestly and fairly so as to know their tax money is to good use. Disputes between players that lie outside the jurisdiction (i.e. citizens vs non citizens) of the government organization would not be resolved by the government and therefore contracts cannot be made enforceable. In this case, the willingness to agree to a contract depends on the players risk tolerance as well as the trust the player has of the other player.
I really hope the emergent gameplay allows for such organic complex civilizations to arise.
-
Perhaps people could create security cameras throughout their base (or large space station) and can monitor them from a control room. This might add an interesting twist to PvP.
Another use case would be for large ships that would otherwise be difficult to land or maneuver through structures or or cities (though a 3rd person view might mitigate this point). Or perhaps to allow a ship captain to better orchestrate the crew on-board.
I'm envisioning a control room like in sci-fi movies that have dozens of monitors, each of which correspond to different cameras.
I'm not sure what technical hurdles would be to achieve this, but the cameras could be a low frame rate and low resolution. For cameras near the player, i would imagine that the image can be rendered on client side (I don't think trusting the client for this would be an issue since its the client viewing the images in the first place). Cameras at a distance from the player would have to render the images server side when the player approaches the monitor I would think. I can't say what the performance considerations would be for that but perhaps long distance cameras would have a hefty cost to operate, so as to artificially reduce the amount players make, thus less work for the server.
Of coarse I could be speaking out of my a** in regards to the implementation details but those are just my thoughts. So I'll leave it up to the Dev Team
0.25.8 HERMES UPDATE: Missions and more - Discussion thread
in General Discussions
Posted
and yea... the glaring FX when in build mode is a bit much. Why is there such a difference between the deploy element tool and say the scanner tool?