Jump to content

dw_ace_918

Alpha Tester
  • Posts

    155
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dw_ace_918

  1. Hey @yamamushi what do you think about rp with Roberts Rules of Order? That's what I'm offering ?hmm, no, how about gamers vs Roberts Rules of Order? Maybe...? Check out my idea, if you haven't. Partnership for the Creation of Civilization, it's an idea and a work in progress. Message me if you want. I will look for you on discord. I know that this isn't what you are looking for, but maybe interest.

  2. @yamamushi I'm sure you will (if not already have) find a meaningful place to have fun and contribute. I bet a lot of people, I'll include myself, feeling alone. Looks like you have skills too! Do orgs really have applications? Idk, isn't this supposed to be a social game? I hope you find what you are looking for.

  3. @Nanoman thanks for the link.  As far as the idea I have been proposing, I tend to agree with you.  I can't preach player voting power and community then say except when I don't like the majority consensus against it.  If you wanted to dig through the forum, you probably would find the core of my reasoning and various aspects of how it would be different.  I'm pretty much stepping out of the way if anyone wanted to add to my side of this or offer up other ideas on it.

  4. @virtuozzo I can see the value of the quote tool if it's use well for small point on point organization in a response. You're alright man, you always have a lot to add to the conversation. I don't know if I'm the best person to argue those points. Does anyone think there's any value, in any way to this idea of community org or suggested tools?

    Finally, I'll end with a quote:

    "A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still."

  5. @Nanoman I did read those devblogs. I have looked into different orgs also. I agree that there are large possibilities and options already planned for orgs. For me, the main focus of the game is Civilization Building, and rebuilding Civilization as well as a strong focus on community and player created content. I saw this from the kickstart to the devblog. Organizations don't seem to final and complete at this stage. I think a lot is assumed based on the standard player expectations and desires, which obviously have to be strongly considered into every aspect of the game I suppose. They did say there is a lot of risk they are talking in general to the creation of the game itself.  I also understand that it would be impassable to please everyone.

  6. Hey @unown006, absolutely, we should have both types. I guess the topic is focused the ability to use force fields, primarily for based defense, right. So, one way we could look at it is a super powerful defence bubble. It could be easy to get, compatible with static constructs (cuz of some scientific reason), and it would provide a one time limited use (uses a lot of power, and lasts 48 hours). Kinda as a last resort, like  EMP is used.  Just some thoughts. Shield would be damage reducing and force fields would be more or less an electric structure that nothing can pass through.  Those are some of my thoughts on the idea. And they should be available in different and gnarly color effects (for defence porpoises).

  7. Hello all! So I added a rule yesterday for this topic. I'm asking everyone to please avoid using the "QUOTE" tool, and use the @name call out to communicate to users. I've seen quote used well and spring, and I've seen it abused. Name callout, cuz we are talking to people, not strings of words.

  8. Shields (the si-fi kind) vs force field.

    Uses, cost, power consumption. How much damage do they prevent? Do they degrade in effectiveness against damage over time or do they supply constant levels of protection? Is there a variety of protection and color?

  9. Hello @unown006. Big numbers. Sounds about right. Survival, yes. What about rebuilding civilization? Anyway, I added a rule, I'll mention, please don't use the "QUOTE" tool, use the name callout.

     

    I hope the big ones ain't run by big ... um.. jerks.  Just give me org and let me build.  Additionally, something about no one should own organizations if everyone don't own it. Power to the players! Community above candidates! Freedom and justice for all!

     

    Can orgs do it?

    Is it possible?

    What's the incentive?

    Why do people hate gov org?

  10. @CoreVamore Please don't quote me.  I will definitely be looking into orgs that share my ideals.  I'm really not trying to force my system into the game, it seemed like a good idea to add to the idea box, so I did, and I still believe it has merit.  I'm not trying to offend anyone.  The majority of feedback has been opposed to this from the start, so I don't expect anything.  Truly, I hope I can simply enjoy the finer aspects the game has to offer, and I hope my pessimistic assumptions about what org systems will become are wrong.

×
×
  • Create New...