Jump to content

Soro

Alpha Tester
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Soro

    Backer count

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    there is a discussion about a change of two? Really?? It could be anything from a credit card being over limit to someone being over budget, a Xsolla error, or a dozen other choices that come to mind. Two is not shocking, if you were talking 200 then there would be something to discuss. As it is well within any industries variance statistics.

    Let's discuss something important like when we can expect the link to download DU  :)

    "Probably After Release"

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, blazemonger said:

     

    We're not getting ready for the game, we are getting ready to start testing, fixing and expanding what will eventually be a full on rocking and rolling game.

    Exactly! For those who love testing new games, this is what we live for! Bring on the game so we can see what can be broken to make it stronger!

    Place your gaming Curriculum Vitae here!

    in Off Topic Discussions

    Posted

    Well let's see if I can keep it somewhat current

     

    Avorian

    Ascent - For the community building

    Elite Dangerous

    Empyrion - Galactic Survival on multiple servers

    gates of horizon

    Homeworld 1 & 2

    Eve online

    MOO 1,2,3, and 4

    No Man's Sky_Especially since the latest patch

    Osiris New Dawn - just switched to the open beta for the changes they recently did and want tested

    Distant Worlds

    Polaris

    Civ beyond Earth

    ROKH

    Space Rangers - The whole series because it is a hoot

    Star Trek Online

    Stellaris

    Gal Civ 1,2,3

    Evochron

    Mass Effect  1& 2

    Space Empires 4 & 5

    StarPoint Gemini 2 and Warlords

    The entire X Series

     

    that's a partial list be in keeping with the request  :)

     

    Alpha Postponed. Thoughts:

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    I am excited by the "Pre Alpha release.

    I think allowing up to 1500+ people at the server at this time will be a good test for NQ and DU. The fact that they want to keep what a promise although it is not quite ready to their standards of release may speak to a desire for perfection.

    Until we can get into the game and see what is waiting we'll never know. As for the NDA and not wanting to see it streamed; I can understand that.

    Some people just have a desire to try and destroy something so they can feel good about themselves. It's sad but true.

    Bring it on NQ, Thanks for having some faith in us as a community.

    Issues with game development based on pledges

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    I played Eve for 10+ years

    i have EA games (Empyrion, 7 days to die, etc)

    p2w games and sp games also

     

    Games cost money to develop, that is a fact. I would rather spend mine on supporting a great idea and help it make it to market without the pressure from corporate sponsors... and I would keep on paying to keep the patches coming similar to how it was\ is done in Eve.

    Why? Because the game stays vital and interesting by keeping the dev's on the project. If you don't like that idea there are alot of games out there where you will pay for the game once, and if development continues for the game you will pay a price for the DLC's that follow. That price is usually at 50% of the original purchase price. But those type of games don't have the same type of ... call it reality feel that Eve does and that DU is striving for.

    To me that is worth the pledge to get it developed and worth the sub price to keep it going.

    greif and trolls

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    My definition of griefers would be something like this

    a Person or Persons who attack or disrupt a player(s) ability to enjoy a pastime (game) to the point that they either stop enjoying the game or stop playing the game altogether.

     

    The suggestion by John " For example, the community could exchange info on "bad" players and create a list of these players. If the Bounty stretch goal on the crowdfunding portal is reached (or even if it is not), the community could always take apart players having really bad behaviors, via a common approval from all the major organization... " sounds like a reasonable one.

     

    The community would have to decide together what would constitute the bad behavior by the "bad" players and possibly work with the Developers on possible solutions to said "bad" behavior.

     

    Just my two cents

×
×
  • Create New...