Jump to content

DrDerp

Member
  • Posts

    78
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DrDerp

  1. I wonder what will persist longer, NQ and their inability to communicate and deliver a working game or the core players taking every slap in the face.
  2. Better open a ticket and cancel it properly. To do so in forum most likely isn't sufficient. In th EU I might even think of revoking the contract, since in the mail's I received I couldn't find a proper customer information.
  3. They would ignore us, since we scrape planets for pebbles and get into quarrel about pebbles (and features and focuse of the universe). That insults their intelligence. So they choose to ignore us and dont care to bother with greedy monkey like creatures who play with sand 🙃
  4. Also mein Post war ein Scherz. Unabhängig davon läuft es ja seit längerem eher mäßig mit der Entwicklung. Das mit dem 29.7 direkt auf den Release von starbase an
  5. Dont forget to cancel your subscription via xsollo. After all you should quit paying when U quit playing, unless Ur a true believer
  6. Make sure you re in the right inventory. I had issues when I had the linked container linked/activated, since Ur construct probably is in the main inventory
  7. I think this idea is the problem. The game is grindy, complicated and partly tedious. You want someone to grind 50hours and want an easy 10 hour grab. That doesn't seem balanced and will lead to the extinction of zebras. So it depends if the game aims to be hardcore PvP mainly that might be a way to go. Like legion did, every hc PvP can celebrate his victory (with the remaining few hundred on a vastly empty "metaverse", due to skills/time they will be like god's ruling the game, at the same time discouraging new players even pvpers) . Secondly the game just isn't fast paced enough to support casual players the way PvP is. Imagine how many players would play rust, if you needed a 2 week grind to drop a base and get basic gear but then be raided in a 5min raid overnight. So I think finding a proper middle ground (each group has to acknowledge and respect the other groups and their needs) might bring a balance and a longterm chance of survival for the game. If the community stays so split, with extreme interestgroups it will stay in limbo. Also I don't see how PvP would bring the broken economy to life
  8. I don't think that that is what he meant. As far as I understand it he said that exploits or possibilities to exploit aren't an argument not to grant test accounts to attract players
  9. Maybe because breaking the game-exp for other parts of the community makes them leave, breaks the financial support, and speeds up the decline of the game. Same goes for all other parts/groups that exploit disbalance. I think, though NQ has to take most responsibility, community is also split and scattered in ( partially extreme) interestgroups who only want to see their specific ways of playing to succeed. So they also contribute to the broken state of the game. And if pvpers overextend they shouldn't be surprised if other playergroups counter by using disbalanced features. That way the game Futher derails and will stay on the constant accusations and nagging between different playergroups. Like in RL it's always someone else's fault if shit gets out of hand😉
  10. What? doesn't Ur equation state that Content is 0/not present!? If qanta equals qanta plus/and content, content is 0. Thus qanta=schematics.🧐😉
  11. Isn't it more like NQ doesn't care or isn't able to remove long-term inactive property and constructs? If they did so, there would be no problem with test accs besides not grabbing Dollars.
  12. The above, and read the forums and get an impression. If you have a high pain threshold (masochism-level), lots of patience and time, are forgiving and can bear to see a snail crossing a razorblade, then it is already time to try the game. if Ur not so much for alpha/beta/EA mambojambo then wait another 2 years and see if du is still around. Or ask someone with Alts to borrow one
  13. Yes it would be great, they could implement an upkeep for territory units. If you don't feed the TU, it should dissolve.
  14. You could also try to empty the shader cache of Ur GPU. That helped me when I got permanent pending operations
  15. Well I can tell U Ur Not missing out on winning a brand new iPhone. Since I couldn't find out how to insert a poll in the forum, I used an external poll.
  16. I don't know. Curiosity maybe. But if U feel like it's a scam, then better don't.
  17. Hey now! Don't talk bad about glaciers. They re trying..and thx to global warming they re speeding the heck up. So they benefit from around 50*C in Canada.. NQ it seems not. even NQ got a bit better, eventhough we still have to think and plan eons.
  18. Sphere of influence? 😂 What is that supposed to be and Where did U get that idea? Whatever it may be, NQ stated boarding other players constructs. So we would have to be in or at least on your ship/building. Also 😉 we need proof of your legitimation to speak on behalf of any unmentioned orgs you were speaking for. Also if you drop your ship on market6 I assume a right of way since your blocking public ground. .....sue me 🧐🥳
  19. One way to counter that might be to make it less grindy. If ppl don't have to fear to lose the work of weeks in an instant. They would be less risk averse. So less grind for resource gathering and more active gameplay. As you said limit the destruction, make robbery possible but limit destruction. But I guess DU, even if they decide that would be a way is years from that. I guess ppl also dislike the idea of a wipe that much, because gameplay is very slow. On the other hand I still don't get the idea of being a king in a possibly dying game rather than trying to restart and keep/bring the game to life. To the point that ppl state not playing anymore, yet insist on their property. Yeah but with DU/NQ and the community expectations is the topic and issue. Also like you indicate there seems to be quite the opposites/extremists in the game. Each want their game/gamestyle (to the max). There seems to be to little middle ground/compromise to make a working game out of the parts at hand.
  20. You could try and play a session on GeforceNow. If the issues still occurs on the same spots, it might be server-/enginewise. If not, it might be your hardware
  21. Well read your post butI still disagree. I wouldn't even refer to wiki, yet since u did read the whole article, esp. the definition. But maybe we stop going right or wrong and agree to disagree, since further discussion will be more RL/general than game related.
  22. Well you fail to show how there would be an inflation in the game. Raising prices per se ain't Inflation. Also I meant and said prices rising above the bot prices.
×
×
  • Create New...