Snipey
-
Posts
129 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Snipey
-
-
5 hours ago, Waffle Boy said:
NQ,
PTS didn't include the supposed flotillas. We need answers now! No ask aphelia in sight. DU PvP already has a huge amount of faults that make it difficult to learn and boring to play with. We REALLY need this system to identify enemies easier. It's so annoying to sort through a bunch of ship names when in a fight. Also enemy ships should be RED! Not the same color as your ally. This is sad that PvP has so many faults that could be fixed easily. You can't even see enemy speed and direction unless you have a lua script, that should not be necessary. Another barrier to entry for pvp btw!
FIX PVP BEFORE RELEASE!
Why do you care so much about such a boring miniscule part of the larger dumpster fire that is Dual Universe?
The base game is not fun at all so what makes you think people will even want to play to the point they can PVP.
Another Legion NEET with no sense of game design just coming to the forums to cry like usual.
-
-
11 hours ago, ELX987 said:
to be fair the only posts regarding me that you have made are drama related so...
also arent those IRL politics in your PFP?
Tell us again how you started a thread that doxed an NQ employee.
-
Idk why everyone is so upset over alts. It helps pay the devs salary at the end. Just build a stronger org and let hem waste their money.......
Cry about something that's actually broken for once ffs.
-
3 minutes ago, space_man said:
If you enjoyed the game, then you paid for that time.
A wipe doesn't just mean an end, its a new beginning.
Now lets holds around the camp fire and sing kumbaya.
It's a persistent game. The fact that they can't keep up with it means in 1 month after a wipe of any kind the same problems will still exist.
Betas are usually a 1 time purchase like the founders packs. The second they started charging a monthly sub for access is a "soft launch".
I have never heard of a game charging monthly for a beta they will just wipe when the company changes hands.
So if the company changes hands 1 year from now will they wipe just to appease newer players?
Will they wipe every patch because they are a lost puppy with no idea what they are doing?
They should have just kept plugging along without thinking of a wipe. Now they are in territory that will destroy the game and most likely will not recover.
Watching NQ since 2020 they are horrible with communication and ideas. They never listen to feedback and regularly release tone deaf posts saying "we heard you" while simultaneously ignoring everything that was said.
-
-
1 hour ago, Shredder said:
I suspect this is all a fair amount of dev work however
Usually people who are not developers assume what is "easy" this sounds complicated af
-
If you are paying a monthly sub to a game that promised no wipe from the start.
NQ IS RUNNING A SCAM
- Walter, Metsys, FuriousPuppy and 3 others
-
6
-
1 hour ago, Habitant said:
Glad you got the point . Thought you were trolling lol . tbh i enjoy pvp . The whole game basically. I do literally all things in game
Fairness has to do with all things economy , pvp , the whole staff. I am not yelling nor bad arguing just suggesting an single account type of game here. Which will bring more players in and will be more populated than the dead alts thing.
Imagine advocating for a wipe instead of joining other players to become more powerful like the game was intended.
Care bears always ruining the game complaining about problems they create for themselves instead of trying to overcome them.
I bet you got so many participation trophies as a kid. Your parents probably gave you a gold star for everything you did.
You are the problem with DU
-
A wipe would literally solve nothing as people would just abuse the new mechanics in the same way.
You are doing literally nothing but a complete flusher of an idea.
-
-
6 hours ago, blazemonger said:
Not really, beta keys were perks and the cost of a pack was mostly coveringthe included DAC
Besides that, it's really not the point of the discussion whether the key was free or not.
Hey smart guy. Let me hit you with logic you have failed to even consider.
BETA KEY HOLDERS WILL JUST BUY A SUBSCRIPTION FOR THOSE ACCOUNTS.
Glad nobody thought of that before. -
26 minutes ago, Thunderblaze said:
You can not post a mission as an org.
If you buy items on a market as an org you cannot ship the item as an org. It has to be purchased as a player.
-
🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽
WIPE HYPE
🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽🧻🚽 -
1 hour ago, space_man said:
Hey sounds like the long awaited mining unit API is coming. Good thing, otherwise I'd forget to calibrate every Saturday.
Come on NQ... We're waiting.
That means they would have to program something useful. Instead they focus too hard on the grand vision they fail at basic shit that needs to happen.
WHERE IS THE ABILITY TO DISABLE MY FRIENDS LIST LOCATION LOCK FFS -
20 minutes ago, fridaywitch said:
I'm sorry, but using the word "wipe" and then not giving us any information at all has literally left me not even wanting to play this game because I don't even know if I should even bother building anything.
You can't just use that term and not give us any information.
After the rocky development the only way a "wipe" makes any sense is if they are referring to using the toilet
-
3 hours ago, Zarcata said:
You can pay for areas with tons of available quanta, but it just makes a minus on the player. The number of calibrations is very limited. A small number of territories each player can have, quanta doesn't matter.
So you can't generate unlimited ores, because you don't have unlimited calibrations.
How many MUs can you reasonably run at the moment? 30-40? Means you could set up 3-5 MUs with good fields and need only 5-13 fields. So what do you want to do with more fields, except burn your Quanta reserves for taxes?Why did you go out of your way to start writing in color?
-
This is too complicated for NQ as we don't have a group system or even the ability to stop friends from locking onto us.
NQ aims big but can't deliver on simple non game changing quality of life features.
This game will die because of NQ failing simple game design.
-
1 hour ago, CptLoRes said:
And that most likely means players leaving the game.
So once again like with 0.23, NQ has managed to drive away players with their "game saving" features. Makes you wonder how many more "features" this game can survive..
Saying "Feature" would mean they added something to the game rather than shifted around the poo
-
26 minutes ago, Jake Arver said:
Again, NQ never, not once, said there would not be a wipe. Feel free to prove me wrong.
You would be a complete fool to wipe at this point. With the path of destruction behind NQ and DU at this point there is no "Brand Recovery" This game will crash hard as they have destroyed any chance of good PR through terrible company action. Any attempt to further this cause is just digging the grave deeper.
-
Just now, sHuRuLuNi said:
So, are you saying I need to go into RDMS then I need to click on the Player Tab on the top (and not on the ORG tab) .. and then create a Tag, a Policy and Rights inside the player TAB?
Now, I suppose as an Actor I need to insert the ORG? (as in which actor needs the right to use the mining unit)
OWNER OF TILE: PLAYER(YOU)
VVVV GIVE RDMS TOO THIS VVVV
OWNER OF CONSTRUCT: ORG
-
2 minutes ago, sHuRuLuNi said:
No I did no such thing. I said it is not about someone SPAMMING, it is about YOU not being allowed to WRITE one single WORD here IN THIS FORUM.
And if someone wants to spend 3 hours writing in the general chat about their sexual activities I DO NOT GIVE A FUCK. He should be free to do so if he so wishes.
You can have normal functions in the chat where you cannot flood the chat - as in, yo write 2 messages then you have a delay of 30 seconds or so before you can write again - which is a normal standard function used in many Live Chats.ONCE MORE: I DO NOT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT THE CONTENT OF WHAT HE IS WRITING. He is free to write whatever the hell he wants.
Free speech on a companies platform where you agree to be moderated as the company sees fit?
Are you suffering a brain injury and do you need assistance?
-
12 minutes ago, Jake Arver said:
So you placed a mining unit on a construct owned by an org which is on a tile owned by you?
As the org legate, you shoudl have full rights to the org constructs and thus to the mining unit on the construct, as you own the tile, you should have full rights to minie on that tile.
If this is about the fact that the mining unit is on the org construct, which makes the org (as owner of the construct) the actor needing rights to mine on the tile, Knowing NQ that would make perfect sense for them while it makes so sense to pretty much anyone else. The part that is off her eis that the mininung unit needs access to the tile and not the construct. So regardless of who owns the construct, who ever owns the mining unit need to be what determines the rights..
I am almost tempted to test this..If the player owns the tile and the construct is owned by the org it does not matter what your standing is the org needs perms to mine.
We have tested this countless times.
-
10 hours ago, Jake Arver said:
In the few weeks after beta last year, concurrent logings peaked at around 3700 and started dropping quickly from there. Then NQ closes the API they forgot they had left open with no passowrd.
NQ says thaht player number stabalized earlier this year.. but that means absoluitely nothing as having 100 people online at any given time is a "stabalized" player count. I personally doubt numbers hit 4 digits except for maybe around patches when people have a peek or now set their TU as HQ and leave again like I did.
Man, this game looks like a badly lit Chirstmas tree now with all the bright and pulsing colored surface ricks.. it just looks awful.
They sure do love making things pretty instead of functional.
You can only put so much lipstick on a pig. It's still a pig.
Space Station Combat Mechanics
in General Discussions
Posted
Sadly the game will die before we ever see warp beacons again