Jump to content

FryingDoom

Alpha Tester
  • Posts

    214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FryingDoom

  1. 54 minutes ago, Moosegun said:

    Just add a BIG RED SECTION down the centre of each market, if you land in that section you get a warning - SHORT STAY PARKING if your vehicle is left here for more than 4 hours it will be DELETED with all its contents, this leave the edges for longer term parking / marketing but the main section of the landing for proper short term parking.

     

    Of some of these scruffy muppets lose some ship then there you go.

     

    Did you really hit a space station at 10km?  Was your radar broken or were you afk?

    Hold on didn't you just finish saying that PvP is an integral part of this game? now here you are suggesting PvE fixes to players fighting players over parking spots. 
    So which is it?

  2. 17 minutes ago, Moosegun said:

    Neither WoW or Elite were player driven games though, this is a pretty much 100% player driven game, so the danger HAS to come from players, if you are removing pvp, then you are basically removing any risk at all.  The game is then broken, nothing has any value.

     

    Why did you by a game with pvp and then try to get it removed / dumbed down?  It has been very clear from the start that it would have pvp pretty much everywhere.  Why do people buy games and then complain about well advertised elements of it.

    Oh so you add the term player driven and suddenly PvP must be compulsory.

     

    Why do I get the feeling this game is going to just end up as a copy of EvE where most of the players left years ago.

  3. Just now, Moosegun said:

    Because the game needs conflict, it needs voxel / money sinks, it does not need EVERYTHING in game to be accessible in safety, which is currently the case.  Hell even pvp zone is not even remotely dangerous at the moment.

     

    Your pvp / pve answer isnt really an answer, so your issue is that people post comments? Sorry you have lost me now. The bottom line is there is no difference apart from the fact human players are far harder to beat and it feel a bit more personal.  The bottom line is that pvp / pve conflicts are actually very similar.  

     

    Although I 100% agree that pvp player WILL moan about us getting more defenses, that are mainly cowards that pray on the weak but that is what pirates should be.  It is up to you to not to be weak.

    No my answer is if something is so unpopular that they can't get enough people to do it why should it be forced on people.
    World of Warcraft learned this when they realised how unpopular PvP servers were and made it opt in, as did Elite Dangerous.

  4. 12 minutes ago, Moosegun said:

    Why do you have a ship that cant fight back in pvp space?  If you choose to do that it is your fault, not the games.

    Why does so much space have to be given over to PvP? If most people hate PvP which is apparent because of the lack of it without PvP occurring, if you don't force people to PvP.

     

    As to PvP v PvE, ever seen a PvE pirate harass the same player? post the comments on a third party site? or for that matter complain about players being able to get better defences?

  5. 6 minutes ago, Moosegun said:

    The other solution is to remove any alloys T2 from Alioth / Madis / Thades and there moons.  So players that are scared of losing pixels can potter about in safe zone, and those of us who dont mind heading out into space can bring back the good stuff from them.

    I am an industrialist trader but I am 100% for open pvp in as many areas a possible but ONLY when NQ gives us the tools we need to combat it

    • RDMS to include shared KOS / Friendly lists of other orgs players
    • The ability to store information on player who attacked org assets

    PvP is vital as a means to add risk to a game that has none, it add values to products and gameplay.  Without any NPC's there needs to be pvp to create a sink for all the wealth being created.  NQ are clearly in no rush though, development to date 100% suggests that they are happy for us to keep building up civilisation before we start to knock some of it down and I think that is a good thing.  The fact that PvP updates arent even in the first part of the roadmap suggests how important NQ place it in the big scheme of things.  Think we are a good 3-6 months of relaxing of safe zones / atmos pvp.

    PvE also adds risk and a lot more people seem to enjoy that than they do PvP.

     

    What I find startling is the fact that PvP gamers always talk about how good PvP is but they only ever seem to want to attack non-PvP players in ships that cannot fight back, against players with no interest in learning all of the skills and abilities to PvP. They never seem to form into opposing groups in areas with the aim of attacking other PvP players.

  6. 10 minutes ago, Busterguy said:

    right now the only pvp content is camping travel routes to kill people slow bloating to and from planets. Removing this safe zone will make it harder to bring ores back to peoples factorys from other planets without the use of a warp drive. Tus raising the cost of travel to avoid pvp or to make more risk to get the ores off planet. So it will help the economy in a big way. 
    Will raise the value on ores on alioth and sanc that are off planet and give more purpuse to pvp.

    Hold on, if PvP is so highly loved by so many, surely there must be thousands of people feely engaging in PvP, as so many love it.

     

    Why do you need to force people into PvP if it is such a great thing?

  7. 31 minutes ago, Fendalton said:

    NDA was lifted, you can say whatever you want

    Actually no. The NDA being lifted means you can talk about the game now. Theoretical conversations however from before the NDA was lifted are also fine. It is just the game and what occurred with the game and NQ during that period would not be.  (This is NOT legal advice)

  8. 24 minutes ago, itsmeB3AR said:

    So i have a couple of issues. Ive put tickets in but ill also ask unless im missing something. 

     

    1. So i purchased the game before beta. I didnt join any forum though, I received emails for the beta and played the game breifly but performance was bad so i decided to wait. 

     

    Why do i not have access to pre beta content now though ? 

    (Im trying to converse with an alpha player which i also am. But apparently my account says i dont have access. Which i should) 

     

    2. The pack i purchased claims to come with a beta key. Which i also dont have. I checked my account and it definitely said it should come with a beta key. 

    I have every email ive received since purchasing the game , no email about a beta key. 

     

    Any assistance would be greatly appreciated 

    Goto https://www.dualuniverse.game/

    Login

    Goto the drop down under your email address, look at "My Products"

    Your Beta Keys should be there.

  9. 12 minutes ago, joaocordeiro said:

    I dont like industry. 

    But because of BS prices, im forced to have my own fuel and warp cell factory. 

     

    I wander, if anyone is able to play the game without owning or having a friend that owns industry. 100% using the market to sell ore and by elements. 

     

    If yes, can you tell me what have you managed to buy/own? 

    Given the game has only just started and most industry players are still working on their own set ups, it is very unlikely. This is like yelling at a baby because they can't drive yet.

  10. 39 minutes ago, blazemonger said:

     

    It seems that NQ decided to let someone randomly change number in the industry batches table. There is not relation at all between items used in recipes and batches produces..

     

    Example;

    Hydraulics are used in 1, 5, 25, 125 or bigger numbers yet the batch is 4, how does that make sense?

    Voxel material minimum production is 180m3?

     

    really NQ?

    I tried to start some polished white marble today that now out puts in 60m3. I thought it was a bug.

  11. 16 minutes ago, Moosegun said:

    My sources were only backing up the opinion I originally held, again nice deflection, nice effort at trying to discredit.  Can see we are at an impasse, not sure this is worth my time now.

    Edit: Actually that sounded too cruel.

     

    So for you after a 3 second internet search.

     

    https://www.history.com/news/who-invented-the-internet#:~:text=The first workable prototype of,communicate on a single network.

     

     

     

  12. Just now, Moosegun said:

    Generally when two people have a difference of opinion, sources are used to corroborate those opinions, NO research I have done backs up anything you say.  Your inability to back up these statements you have made with any reference suggests to me that you are just making things up.  As do your lame attempts at deflection. 

    That was before Trump. Now with so many Trump supporters, flat earthers, anti-vaxxers, anti-covid believers. Whats the point. I believe what I believe, you believe what you believe. In another words simple sources available in any person who spent 10 seconds typing "Invention Internet" are not worth my time to convince you. If you believe something different from me, good for you.

     

    Its called I am not your mum or your teacher and this is not a doctoral thesis.

  13. Just now, Moosegun said:

    So no source then...... you were just making it up

    Who am I to dispute what you believe? If history and Trump supporters have shown, there is no point trying to change peoples minds and a lot of people ignore basic facts. So why bother. You want to believe The Internet was created in the year 2000 by the God Thor, who am I to change your mind or even care?

×
×
  • Create New...