Thunderchrome
-
Posts
78 -
Joined
Posts posted by Thunderchrome
-
-
so much drama because of a tiny 1000m high building. learn to fly is all i gonna say.
-
to get even more free boosts and bonus items use my recruiter link to create your new account for DU:
https://www.dualuniverse.game/signup?recruiter=88041
shameless? i know!
-
do i understand that correctly
only a few hundred players are allowed to have a piece of land on sanct and 99% of all players dont??? I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT THE START.
so the 1% (or less) get one extra exclusive planet/moon? what is this, is Klaus Schwab running NQ now? is this part of "ZE GREAT RESET"?
i have another question if that is true:
seriously, whos "genius" idea was that?
-
-
all these other games have one big advantage and that is no sub required and thats the main reason why DU will not survive for long.
-
Dont come with "our engine cant do it" or any other BS excuse. a pro programer could add it to the game in 1 day. do it for the launch!
-
-
there should be a giant asteroid belt(so big that you can hide inside of it) half of it is inside the safe zone the other half in pvp zone. higher tier ore is mostly found in the pvp zone. there should be higher tier(up to tier3) ore in the safe zone but much more rare than in the pvp zone. no DSAT crap, no broadcasting crap. the asteroids "regenerate" over time.
thats how i would do it.
-
maybe you should change this thread into a "starter tipps" thread. collect all the tipps and tricks, make a big list.
-
i dislike the change aswell.
the differences are waaay too big.
and marble super lightweight? haha good one! (just one of many stupid examples)
i was thinking of a different system.
-smaller difference of stats
-more realistic
-talent based specialization
talents that improve the stats of a specific honeycomb if your own factory produces it. like more HP or less weight, better resistances etc. whatever you like.
a ship with fully improved T1 materials should be on the same lvl or better as a T2 ship without improved materials.
maybe a stupid idea, i have no clue
-
1 hour ago, Wyndle said:
I think that there are enough systems and play loops for this to function as an MMO. One thing that Eve didn't have to contend with that DU may face is Steam review brigades. It is possible for one troll to put the hurt on sales.
i expect "Mixed" reviews which would be accurate imho. most negative reviews will say: "unfinished", "grindfest", "boring", "subscription? lol" and they are not that wrong... but NQ knows that and has to move forward and keep improving the game.
-
"Abo games are my favourite, you have an overview of your costs and can enjoy the game without any problems."
you can have that with F2P aswell, what a stupid comment
"WoW isn't a dying dinosaur either"
yes it is, every statistic shows that and blizzard started to hide the sub numbers because they are horrible
The problem with f2p is and remains an enormous risk for the developer, because he cannot foresee how many players will buy what in the shop, one mistake and a large player base is gone from the game and the house of cards immediately collapses
yeah one mistake and a large player base is gone from the game you mean like patch 0.23 in DU? another stupid comment
Even if the customer for the annual pass is gone after a month, the money has already been collected.
sounds almost like a scam/cashgrab strategy. im not surprised that you like that kind of strategy
At the moment, DualUniverse as an f2p would simply mean death.
who says that, you? laughable. i tell you what death means: extreme low player numbers like the game has for a year now. NQ talked alot about new players in their wipe video and i highly doubt that alot of new ppl will sub for game that has not a good reputation and is unfinished.
-
8 hours ago, Shredder said:
If there’s no sub, then there’s no guarantee of further content, without further content the game dies.
yeah no. sub based mmos are not the future and it doesnt fit the goal of DU. DU needs alot more players to feel alive again and they will NOT come with a sub based model. F2P + cashshop is a much better option for this super niche game. yes alot of ppl will leave quickly after release again because they realise that DU is not finished at all but some will come back later after a few updates. nobody likes to pay just to login for 5mins to see what changed. eve and wow are dieing dinosaurs and DU is a fly compared to these two.
-
2 hours ago, PopsiclePete said:
In another response I wrote just now a very possible option jumped into my mind. The cash shop may well get announced.
i prefer shop + no sub. i would even pay full price (60$) just to not pay a sub.
-
yeah they are all the same now. sorry for being offtopic
-
59 minutes ago, Pleione said:
Worse than NQ? Wouldn't anything be a step up? (Shy of someone buying it just to milk a few dollars before shutdown)
if you look it that way... but then NQ has to make some changes. new (fake) genders need to be added. the game will need persons of color and no white ppl. also a much better chatfilter so nobody and their grandma or any alien lifeform can be offended. too much work for NQ. i forgot the most important change: homosexuality needs to be promoted everywhere in the game because thats whats ubisoft is all about today.
-
1 hour ago, PopsiclePete said:
My hope:
Announcement of a buyout of NQ by someone like Ubisoft
or
a new VC investment round of 40 -ish million (while it may seem unlikely at first sight, I'd not exclude this one)or
a publisher like Coffeestain steps in (their experience woudl be invaluable)
My fear:
"NFS/blockchain will be the future and Novaquark is putting DU at the forefront of this innovation"
My expectation:
"DU will launch 1st September"
Steam and Epic availability
Honorable mention:
Deal with Shadow
ubisoft? one of the worst publishers in the entire gaming world?
-
-
acceptable news but only if you release on steam and no xolla mafia.
-
49 minutes ago, Celestis said:
A full wipe of everything to level players so that all the old very experienced players have to start back at the beginning along with all the new players, would be a mistake because the best experience for new players is when there are advanced players with loads of stuff available to help them out.
another weak attempt to fool us. you dont care about new players, you only care about yourself and your "wealth". im so sick of all these ppl who try to argue how they should not lose all their stuff. you are pathetic, every single one of you.
gaming is dead anyway, i dont even know why i am here. i stopped playing right after the "glorious" schematic update like most others and i dont plan to play again.
i would only come back if all these come true:
there is a full wipe, everybody starts from 0
you buy the game and then pay never again. no sub bullshit, ingame shop for skins etc. is enough to finance the game
the game is on steam only
no schematics at all (there are much butter ways like specialization via talents)
as you can see i will never play this game again. good luck everybody
-
-
i dont even know what a metaverse is, must be some stupid shit idea from a stupid brain like succerberg the criminal nonhuman piece of garbage.
-
-
agreed
creating ships and buildings is the strongest aspect of this game and pvp is the weakest.
i was shocked when i saw the first pvp video on youtube, a clean 0/10 from me. i feel like only atmospheric combat around planets has potential. i would even like on foot combat like starbase has but this space combat over huge distances is the most boring "pvp" i have ever seen.
- Sabretooth, Zarcata, Rokkur and 2 others
-
5
A Six Step Guide to Saving Save Dual Universe
in General Discussions
Posted
nope.
use the Trump plan: Lets build a Free2Play Model the let the dumb eve whales pay for it.
Problem solved.