Shouldn't the limit be 12 HQ's per player since there is 12 planets?

[Namcigam]

Shouldn't the limit be 12 HQ's per player since there is 12 planets or is that considered over reaching? 

[Zarcata]

and what about the moons?

[Namcigam]

1 hour ago, Zarcata said:

and what about the moons?

 

I thought about that but I'm assuming they may have a real need to reduce the number of headquarters. So, that was merely a compromise.  A headquarter on each planet seems like a reasonable goal but their might be reasons for this beyond my understanding. 

[blazemonger]

There is no reason to have a HQ tile on each planet. If your operations allowyou to have apresence on eachone, I think it woudl be fair to expect yo can cough up 500K per planet per week at least.

Frankly, I think the 5 you have now (and that number may go down in the future) is already rather generous.

 

[Zarcata]

It would make more sense if the protection zones of the outer PVP planets and moons were to fall at the same time as the taxes there. It makes no sense to pay taxes in the PvP area. 
In the protection zone - OK, you can finance the shields with the protection fee...