Zamarus

The irony is strong in this one. Are you not willing to argue further? Then stop replying or something. You are not going to get anywhere with personal attacks and accusations.

You claim to have written many examples where everyone will get profits. Please show me. As Twerk has shown almost all of your examples would hurt all crew roles in a large ship if it were to happen, as well as the overall balance of pvp. I didn't say everyone needs to do one task by the way. No comprendo, that piece of texts is impossible to understand.

Quite ironic there. You have all this time been arguing for only one sort of player. The "i must always strive for a bigger ship" solo player. I think there's a much broader variety of players you would hurt by having it your way than vice versa.

Where did your proper English go? Please elaborate. Btw and edit for your edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midget_submarine

Yes because a car has guns and shields. No, a more fair comparison would be actual warships and submarines. You cant drive and shoot alone in those.

Well by your definition isn't NQ childish then that has stated that solo players will not be able to do all the things that a group of players can pull off? Anyways there will be people who doesn't want something bigger, there will be people who want to spend most of their time on the ground. There will be players roleplaying, doing pvp duels, racing. Everything you can imagine. Theres not only one kind of people as you portray it, the "I want bigger" guy isn't everyone.

I dont think everyone agrees with you that Captaining a big ship is the only goal worth playing for

You define "lazy players can play" based on your idéas. Lazy and busy players can surely play without your suggestions. The difference is that they will have to settle for less. Which should be natural in comparison to time, effort and teamplay put in the mix.

Some of the profiles do have pretty clever descriptions though

Well i think Discord is working fine for now seeing at all the hundreds of DU people that are around on them. Not dissing the idea though.

My two cents on the topic is that if one player is using multiple cannons at the same time using a script, it should only be able to fire on control input (key pressing) and probably be locked in a static direction. If a solo player has the means to launch a salvo with 10 turrets through automation i don't think this game would be the teamwork inspiring game with ship crews as NQ wants. Therefore i don't think you will be able to utilize scripted turrets that well in the game. Logically there's some major limit to it.

Welcome to the DU community and good luck with your org! Also i dig that you went for simplicity when it comes to the logo. Makes it easily applicable on other things you might want to use it on.

I don't see why it shouldn't. All "special treatment" arguments doesn't hold any value in my opinion due to reasons such as the ones Lord_Void presented.

Space doesn't have gravity per say, it's possible that the space station has it

Good luck!

Don't give people ideas now...

Jokes one you i measure everything is average viking beard lengths. "Watch out Harald! There are filthy space Franks coming eighteen beard lengths behind you!

Well it yet remains to be seen. There is plenty of Sandbox MMOs and Sandbox multiplayer games in general that comes without censorship. It'll just have to be a wait and see thing now.

Not sure why you assume that i want to express myself with those things just because i don't believe in censorship. That is a slippery slope right there. And clear-cut is not clear-cut. Some might find genitilia based curse words bad but not implicit racist ones and the other way around. I'm not sure either why you seem to take upon you to state what can be said and not said on Dual Universe. Who are you to judge others expressions. Yet again, this isn't about allowing myself or others to be offensive because i have some angst. For me it's just a matter of reason.

I personally don't agree. It is very subjective what about what is offensive and not. For many it's as simple as looking away if they don't like what they see. For others, they might take it personal and be filled with disgust/rage. Regarding freedom of speech, what you call "responsible speech" is just a limitation of freedom of speech. In it's essence you should be allowed to say irresponsible things, else it's censorship.

I'ma firing my lazer, i'm a farmer in malasiya.

Begs the question. Does your opinion about what looks bad weight higher than whomever built that. Also keep in mind it doesn't strictly have to be curse words or certain symbols.

Do you guys think devs should interfere with certain things like offensive symbols build by voxels and such? For example someone builds a swastika on their base or ship, someone else reports it and devs removes it. Personally i think the game should be 100% free from censorship and rules about things like building potentially offensive structures ,etc. If people are against it enough they should deal with it on their own. For example gather up and raid the "offenders" base or whatever. The in game 'rules' should be made and enforced by the players in my opinion. What do the rest of you think? Discuss!

NICE!

Matrix dodging dance