Jump to content

SimonVolcanov

Alpha Tester
  • Posts

    145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SimonVolcanov

  1. I'm no expert on those things, but in my opinion, making the DACs just an additional premium currency is more harmful than what we propose
  2. Well, NQ have been really awesome with the community so far, so we hope that they keep listening to us, because the community is what in the end will make or break this game
  3. Well, or shortly before trading. Increased risk = increased reward. For example: I'd pay 500€ for a DAC in a Safe Zone. But I'm an explorer and often days of travel time away from the trader. So, I pay three times the price to have it delivered to me.
  4. Alright, lets say we stick with the idea that DACs should not be lootable, because some people think its unfair. What comes after that? I think it is unfair that people can destroy my stuff while I'm offline. Solution: AFK protection. I don't like people with better equipment killing me. Solution: Remove PVP altogether. It might seem a little abstract and farfetched at first, but if you think about it, you'll realise that this is something that might happen.
  5. What does it matter if they can come back within a few hours, completely raze your base and take it all back? Just because they can afford to instantly buy all the resources and rent enough assembly lines by investing into hundreds of DACs
  6. Yeah. So why make them unlootable? If someone feels the need to risk their DACs, let them
  7. Well, I would sure like the normal money to be physical though... even if it means getting robbed. I don't mind that all too much, as long as real money stays unaffected
  8. Since it'd include Drop on Death, I can not like this. Imagine you're out exploring, maybe got a few DACs with you that you plan on using later. YOu have them with you because you don't trust your base protection enough to leave the next months of playtime in there, because if they get stolen, you lost the tons of time you invested in them plus the money for an actual sub, if you want to continue playing. Now, through whatever environmental circumstance you die, days away from the next RN. Your DACs will be gone, so will be a potential long-time user. Sure, for all the raider-types out there it would be a nice feature, as they wouldn't have to put much effort into staying in the game then, but for more peaceful players, I see no upside to DACs being stealable
  9. Even if it's not in the initial release, NQ will continue to add stuff to the game and with us as a community, they will have content ideas for decades to come, so this might be one of them.
  10. True. That's why I limit my greed, or rather have a very based Assistant that limits my greed
  11. Well, of course there is going to be a power struggle, since every group of players wants to be the best, even if not everyone admits it. There are going to be fights over finite resources like safe space and minerals, as well as propaganda wars for members. But this can also be a lot fun, as it adds a nice layer of realism.
  12. I personally like the thought of a power-dependent shield
  13. I don't think DAC fees are a good option at all... since an org with lots of money (real and in-game) would have quite an advantage, while smaller orgs that rely on in-game money only would be disadvantaged, effectively being a P2W feature
  14. I'm not even sure they'll implement an oxygen-system for the same reason they'll only implement locally dynamic water (if I remember this correctly). But on the assumption that you could have at least an ship-wide oxygen level, opposed to section a ship and have several, biomodules could be a thing. I'm thinking maybe whole decks for larger ships (if we even get to build something with more than one deck. Gathering resources might become rather tedious) and additionally the CO2 scrubbers. Maybe have the scrubbers draw more power, but less space consuming
  15. True, true. These nihilistic players, who only seek destruction are what really bothers me... I mean, I want battles and destruction and all, but only between willing parties, not forced upon everyone. Sure, all of this is sandbox and free and stuff, but it would still be nice if people would consider how much time and effort (and money probably) someone invested in something before blowing it to shreds
  16. Sounds like a very nice, but also complicated to implement feature... maybe anyone can repair up to a certain percentage of module/voxel damage, but only those with rights/authorised blueprints can fully restore a ship. That could also lead to some very cool looking, run-down pirate ships, some parts already replaced, maybe some weapons crudely added... so many thoughts, so little time...
  17. Well, my dream scenario would be, that flourishing city emerges around the Arkship, with towers almost as high as the Ark, well polished and financed by the big organisations, but also crude huts, 3 walls and a roof small markets and dark alleys made by whoever happened to pass by...
  18. 1. The planets are rather huge 2. There will be lots of planets So, even if some parts become messed up, in theory the Community can just move. Like in reality, when a territory becomes uninhabitable, the population moves.
  19. One way or another, there should be the possibility to mine on a larger scale than by hand. I mean, if the resource depots are really several kilometers large, you'll need either a mining ship or (my preferred solution) ground vehicles like drills, diggers and such. (I know, they said no wheels, but nothing is set in stone yet)
  20. I will, hopefully not alone, build a Corporate tower (the aptly named Volcanov Tower) which includes hangar bays, living quarters, automated and manual defenses, as well as huge underground storages. It will be the base of my Mining/Producing/Trading empire (might also include shipping and protection services, depending on the size of the organisation)
  21. That is, if the direct vicinity of the Ark ship is even mineable. I mean, they could have a 1km zone around the Ark that belongs to the NPC "Arkship" where no one can mine or build, just to preserve that first impression. The other 19km of the initial safezone can be used for whatever then
  22. I think Nodes will be either player or organisation bound, as otherwise attackers could be respawned inside someones base.
  23. Yeah, piracy should still be possible, even though I'm more of an honest fighter. Gives people a reason to join organisations and actively contribute to their cause...
  24. Well, since I'm starting to become a real included member in this community, I thought I say a few things about myself. My name is Simon, I'm 20 years old, live and Germany and am currently studying IT, but am looking for a trainee position because university is not for me... Anyway, my hobbies include videogames, coding, fantasy literature and watching My little Pony, my favorite music is metal and Nightcore and in the end I spend way too much time on the internet. EDIT: Also, my love for huge walls and underground shelters that stretch for miles is unrivaled... Simon Volcanov CEO of the Volcanov Corporation
×
×
  • Create New...