Lethys
-
Posts
5686 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Lethys
-
-
-
Get the core mechanics right after all those years and im order for EVERYTHING to work they finally need a working server tech which doesn't shit itself when more than 10 constructs or players are involved. If that works then change studio and let others with knowledge and experience get game mechanics right.
Oh and hire a god damn UI dev
- Emptiness and IvanGrozniy
-
2
-
16 minutes ago, Atmosph3rik said:
They already addressed this issue though. Technically they only mentioned "parenting" a ship to move it outside the safezone without the owner's permission.
But you don't expect NQ to predict every possible exploit and include it in the EULA do you?
It's pretty obvious that if figuring out one way to move a players ship outside the safezone to destory it, is against the rules, then figuring out another way to do the same thing, would also be against the rules.
I agree, in general NQ should be clearer about this kind of stuff.
But this situation is crystal clear.
10 minutes ago, XKentX said:There was no "parenting" involved.
Say you are flying from madis to alioth at 30km and do alt+f4. I come to your ship. According to JC: if you see it and it moves, it continues to move.
Now they have a limitation(or a bug) that you don't start calculating physics of the ship you see until you jump on it.
If you jump on it, it continues to fly as it should and will eventually leave the safezone.
What is an exploit here ?
You left a ship that was heading to PVP space, it got to PVP space and got blown up.
If you dock it to space station(real one built on space core, not one that looks like space station but is in fact a dynamic core) it will stay there and not move.
What's the problem?
So yeah, I expect them to change eula accordingly
-
If only we had a well written and understandable eula and tos regarding all those things......but That's obviously not what NQ wants gor whatever reason
As long as NQ doesn't do amything about it (clarifying via eula update) it's fair game to me
-
Part of the game, nothing wrong there. Learn to avoid it and you're gucci.
-
14 hours ago, Vasten said:
Ok.. as a new player i finally understand why o.23 killed the player base..
"Specialize and use the markets" *boot to the head with schematics*
I came in after schematics so I didnt get what all the fuss was about.
Ok.. I have been specializing and have some t4/t5 refining and smelting and basic parts lines up.. I mine ore, refine, produce low level parts from t3 and t4 ores and materials... good mid level products...time to start using the market
What? The lag is so bad its basically unusable? It would take riddiculous time just to go around and put my stuff for sale
What, all the high level stuff is built by god like tychoons with full production lines that dont buy anything but ore?
So I'm left thinking..
I FINALLY GET IT!!I was defending this game and arguing that people must have been cry babies overreacting, cause I was making progress in specializing... I just hadn't got to the point where I was ready to sell yet....as soon as I tried to "take my wares to market" I realized instead of creating an economy of specialists.. all they did was creat an economy of elite industry tycoons and ore mining peasents
At least before 0.23 I could have said...oh well.. if the markets and economy are unusable I'll just make my own stuff and have fun
So........you didn't look at markets FIRST to see what the fuss was all about and then defended the game because ppl who DID look at the market first were telling you how it is but you thought they're crybabies?
Who doesnt look at the market first when you decide what to produce? Lmao, that's golden
I mean, guess it's good that you finally realised your mistake
-
8 hours ago, GraXXoR said:
You keep making sure again and again to tell us that you deleted this game months ago and that you don’t even play the game because it’s beneath you and the community is beneath you.
so how would you know what the game plays like right now?
Yes, I don't play this game anymore but I still log in from time to time to see where it's at. And from this I see that it still lags and doesn't play out well as MMO because of low fps
Never said this community is beneath me, That's just your bias and wanting to Paint me a certain way.
-
-
17 minutes ago, blazemonger said:
I love that we have a CM come in and say that "we are planning quite a few communications about the state of the game and where we're going over the next while.". However well intended this comment is I'm sure. Historically this is NQ-speak for "we will start announcing new stuff soon".
They do that since 2016 or so. Occasional drop in to "announce Big things" which then is forgotten, not done or abandoned after the initial "omg. OMG. That is SO cool!" Thing from the community
-
1 hour ago, blazemonger said:
Player markets is a Kickstarter promise so it needs to be in at release.
As was AVA xD
-
54 minutes ago, Fra119 said:
And then... what? You're stuck in someone else's base :v
Steal lua programs xD
-
7 hours ago, IndigaterJones said:
How can having the high data DU constructs on the clients computer allow someone to miss behave? My point is to have these permanent game related constructs already on the client which will make rendering faster as well as save the client download data. Unless I missed a subtle aspect of the game in your post.
Its the opppsite really atm. I can easily enter bases with my "slow" Internet because all the stuff hasnt loaded yet. Just gotta be fast enough and bam, you're in their base and just wait for stuff to load
-
10 minutes ago, Haunty said:
You have to download constructs and terrain changes and it's not a small amount of data. It shouldn't stay high usage if you're just sitting in one area, once it is done loading it should stop, which is what happens for me when I measure it, but for slow internets it might essentially be constant.
If 80mbit is slow then I wish du good luck finding players who can actually enjoy it with no lag lmao.
As long as server lag and loading isn't solved, there wont be the civ building going on
-
21 minutes ago, NQ-Naerais said:
Thanks for letting us know. The team is looking into this, but if anyone else wants to add any scenarios they've noticed this, please do.
Support had logs and everything about this since 2019, not a new issue. Support knew 2 years ago already
-
56 minutes ago, BaileyVandenbroek said:
I don't want TCUs on Alioth to be related to Energy management
Yes! I want my megafactory which is 100% safe to not use any energy either so that I can produce stuff 24/7, 100% safe, with no risk and no energy cost too! Gotta have to be cheaper then those ppl who produce stuff outside the safezone. Content generating plebs, yuck
-
13 minutes ago, IndigaterJones said:
Lethys, I see this as well when connected to a different network I have. Are you seeing an increase in your total usage?
when I was afk in DU and just stood around, I couldn't even browse the web. Some bandwidth tool (forgot the name) showed constant 5mb/sec download from DU from some AWS server.
Haven't played nor tested since then tho, so don't know if this persists nowadays.
But I notice a high download from DU when I start it to update my talents
-
This was always the case and the reason I can't really play without lag, or at least start the game for 5min for talents every other month. My maximum is 5-8mb/sec which is always used by DU, constantly. Can't get more bandwidth here, so I guess until they solve that it's a game for 100mbit+ users
-
23 minutes ago, Musclethorpe said:
There is no reason to build cities when said buildings are nothing but aesthetic eye candy that serve no functional purpose. In short, more social tools are meaningless without engaging loops to get people playing in the first place.
So much this
-
Higher tier ore should only be available within the pvp zone, like promised. To give ppl something to fight for
-
Players maintaining a bug report tool? Tells a lot lmao
All boils down to communication. Yet again
-
Which was kinda the plan from the beginning. Having at least 3 chars per acc and maybe be able to dac them for simultaneous talent training
-
2 hours ago, blunted said:
sweet talk it was much as you guys want, but all atv folks are jointly responsible to the state as it is.
10 minutes ago, Noddles said:Ah yes. The ATV that NQ couldn't be bothered to listen to.
Nor even bothered to answer basic questions about what they want to do next or how this new mechanic should play out
-
definitely agree that we bittervets don't drive ppl away - DU and NQ are doing that just fine. We simply state whats wrong. And obviously it's a lot
-
54 minutes ago, GraXXoR said:
YOU wish ME luck? That's rich, mate.
You're the one with over 5000+ posts. Not me... I really don't understand why you would waste your time with "toxic" people you are clearly superior to.. (being part -as you are- of the innately and eternally superior EVE community by your own words)...
Also, I am having fun playing the *game* on a daily basis. You are the one who clearly thinks it's not a game by paraphrasing it...
You really and clearly need to find a hobby rather than trying to belittle everyone. Very sad.Love the salt here about ppl whining about others stealing their stuff. It's hilarious. And I love ppl trying to give very bad argunents (mimimimi rl money loss) to justify their reasoning. It's way more fun to read all this then play a boring game where all ppl do is build shiny stuff just to show off but no real benefit in having any of that.
Does this game still have hope?
in General Discussions
Posted
Im ruby. Lifetime sub. You're stuck with me
And please tell me where that Statement I made was "bashing the game" or where in that statement I am being an ass or counterproductive