OutlandishRep Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share Posted September 23, 2016 So you are complaining about an org... That is no longer causing this problem? It kinda sounds like a case of "people are doing something that doesn't appeal to me therefor it is a problem" Good job taking this out of Context. I presented this point to address how replicating organizations from movies is not possible due to copyright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wizardoftrash Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 It'd be like "The Onion" but for DU[/quote "This just in, someone doesn't like something on the internet and posted about it. We can all expect this to get resolved right away, this problem of people making orgs that I don't like" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OutlandishRep Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share Posted September 23, 2016 Anyway, all this is non-constructive. By the way I hate don't really appreciate when people make polemic thread as that one. I will try not to argue any more there. Your opinion, reply number 25. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blacksythe Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 Anyway, all this is non-constructive. By the way I hate don't really appreciate when people make polemic thread as that one. I will try not to argue any more there. Perhaps i was unclear in my response to his accusation that "who cares" is our catch phrase, NQ has no policy about an org saying things so long as they arnt racist or causing grief to others. Nor do I imply that "Who cares" is our catch phrase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OutlandishRep Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share Posted September 23, 2016 Perhaps i was unclear in my response to his accusation that who cares is our catch phrase, NQ has no policy about an org saying things. Nor do I imply that Who cares is our catch phrase. Well, I made the point using the past history of that org. Should I quite making points using examples? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archonious Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 It is too early to sprak about Organisations. There could be so many changes over 2 years, than most of "healthy" orgs will be transformed into inactive. Many of members won't even start to play, many will forget their passes and will create new accounts, many will start look for real organisations on release day (even they will be on community organisation list). Majority of organisations will not be founded. Majority of those which will be founded, will gone (be eaten) by bigger (all members, mostly 1, will join somewhere). So release will balance everything. Even most "healthiest" organisation will have about 30-40% players in release (only IMO, not research). So right now it is more "For Fun", for dreaming. Of course that is my personal view, everything could go absolutely different. Time will show. Thanks, Archonious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OutlandishRep Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share Posted September 23, 2016 It is too early to sprak about Organisations. There could be so many changes over 2 years, than most of "healthy" orgs will be transformed into inactive. Many of members won't even start to play, many will forget their passes and will create new accounts, many will start look for real organisations on release day (even they will be on community organisation list). Majority of organisations will not be founded. Majority of those which will be founded, will gone (be eaten) by bigger (all members, mostly 1, will join somewhere). So release will balance everything. Even most "healthiest" organisation will have about 30-40% players in release (only IMO, not research). So right now it is more "For Fun", for dreaming. Of course that is my personal view, everything could go absolutely different. Time will show. Thanks, Archonious Orgs active now may dispensary, so you can't have fixed settings. You create a system that constantly does this and you have function. My point is not that we should just get a system in place that ensures we don't get "irrelevant" orgs taht aren't even active. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonis Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 Let me address you to the Empire. It's a fine organization now, but it used copyright photo's in it's posts. It also has to yeild this notice to appeal to what Novaquark does and does not want: Empire, Community Page, 23/9/16 Seriously. I can't believe it. We use what is called 'fair use', which means we don't say we own those and we don't simply post them but re-use them, as into the presentation of our factions or logos onto our banners. And yes we have this notice notably to say we won't make a Star Wars regeneration (massive ships, deathstar...), we will consider any option and sci-fi inspiration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonis Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 Leonis, on 23 Sept 2016 - 11:40 PM, said: Anyway, all this is non-constructive. By the way I hate don't really appreciate when people make polemic thread as that one. I will try not to argue any more there. Perhaps i was unclear in my response to his accusation that "who cares" is our catch phrase, NQ has no policy about an org saying things so long as they arnt racist or causing grief to others. Nor do I imply that "Who cares" is our catch phrase. Well I said non-constructive about all that post. I go somewhere else now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wizardoftrash Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 Orgs active now may dispensary, so you can't have fixed settings. You create a system that constantly does this and you have function. My point is not that we should just get a system in place that ensures we don't get "irrelevant" orgs taht aren't even active. Giving orgs a potential expiration timer? Sure Preventing these "irrelevant" orgs from being made? No thanks NOW that your thread is about a simple suggestion and not a general "orgs that I don't like" bash fest, i see your suggestion and think it would be ok. Not that it would be super useful, not really needed, but i do not oppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoneLegionYT Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 Putting big KoS on Outlandish and all friends. Anyone support this we could keep increasing the bounty. Send them back to Planet Cod! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guttertrash Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 I have to agree with outlandish rep, these tiny fly by night organizations are a plague on the community.. Seriously anyone in a small one man organization, particularly ones with questionable names, should be expunged! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OutlandishRep Posted September 23, 2016 Author Share Posted September 23, 2016 Also, thanks for making this a fast growing topic again:D Putting big KoS on Outlandish and all friends. Anyone support this we could keep increasing the bounty. Send them back to Planet Cod! Thanks! I'll be sure to collect it right away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PetdCat Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 I for one, welcome our 700 ghostly overlords of doom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wizardoftrash Posted September 23, 2016 Share Posted September 23, 2016 Also, thanks for making this a fast growing topic again:D Thanks! I'll be sure to collect it right away. Welp, time to a bandon the thread! But for real, that kind of collective KOS nonsense is an ACTUAL plague. This isn't Rust. Leonis 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugsley Posted September 24, 2016 Share Posted September 24, 2016 The point is mute right now anyway. All of these organizations are pipe dreams right now. When the game goes into alpha some organizations will actually exist. Then in beta another influx of new organizations and then when the game goes live for everyone a huge burst of new orgs. But they will all live and die by their behaviours and their members. The orgs with the best leadership and resources will survive just as corporations today come and go so will orgs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now