Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
MCwrath

General feedback on communication/immersion so far

Recommended Posts

Hi there, 

 

Long time fan and player since the last alpha. Let me start out by saying this game has so much potential and is already in a fairly enjoyable and playable state. I don't want to comment on stuff like performance and bug fixes since many have pointed this out already and I think DU staff have their priorities on getting this on-rails asap. 

 

I want to talk about communication mostly, and immersion, and I get the second subject might be a bit further down the line: 

 

Communication - critique:

One of the things I always think impacts general interest in a game and keeps players peeking for updates, especially alpha/beta or early releases, is clear and open communication and roadmaps. Now, I know there is a roadmap, but I want to be frank about this; it doesn't do a good job of peaking my interest. Its vague, incomplete and simply all over the place. Even the implementation of the poll-system, while a very good addition, isn't cutting it.

 

Communication - solution:

I believe the roadmap should be a lot more detailed and divided into short, mid and long term.  On the short term there should be details about implementations in the upcoming weeks, with dates!; think of gameplay tweaks, bug fixes, small gameplay additions etc. On the mid-term, say months, there should be a list of upcoming implementations of small to medium systems/gameplay additions/graphical updates. And on the long-term you can keep the descriptions as you have them now in the roadmap, with focus on big changes and implementations, add-ons and serious gameplay changes. 

 

All-in-all, there needs to be a better grasp of what the team is focusing on. To take it to another level, if you're working in a scrum kind of way, just share the sprints as short-term roadmaps (just an idea). And all of these need to be realistic, the more you need to push stuff backwards, the more you create a backlog and frustration with the players. Its better to start with small increments and deliver, than vice-versa. Its difficult to assess what you guys/girls are working on back there, while that has many people very excited as well if they knew. 

 

Immersion - feedback:

I'll keep this one shorter, but after playing the game for a LOT of hours in the past months, it has come to my attention that a lot is missing in the game which should create more immersion. This is mostly small stuff: sound effects mostly, but also visual effects (like the missing animations of industry)... The galaxy and planets feel deserted, even with the amount of players flying around. Its just not... alive. And there should be random stuff happening... nothing major perse.  

 

Just my 2 cents that I had in the back of my head and needed to write off. 

 

See you in game! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NQ seems to not actually start working on new features until maybe 6 months before they are expected to be released. Most recent indications of this are that they really have no core plans yet for Territory warfare and most of that is still  very fluid while at the same time they seem to want to get that out in 6-8 months which seem to be a very short time when you do not even have the basic plan ironed out for such a vital and high impact mechanic.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, blazemonger said:

NQ seems to not actually start working on new features until maybe 6 months before they are expected to be released. 

They've really taken the rapid development model of sprints a bit tooo far eh....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, MCwrath said:

Communication - solution:

I believe the roadmap should be a lot more detailed and divided into short, mid and long term.  On the short term there should be details about implementations in the upcoming weeks, with dates!; think of gameplay tweaks, bug fixes, small gameplay additions etc. On the mid-term, say months, there should be a list of upcoming implementations of small to medium systems/gameplay additions/graphical updates. And on the long-term you can keep the descriptions as you have them now in the roadmap, with focus on big changes and implementations, add-ons and serious gameplay changes. 

 

All-in-all, there needs to be a better grasp of what the team is focusing on. To take it to another level, if you're working in a scrum kind of way, just share the sprints as short-term roadmaps (just an idea). And all of these need to be realistic, the more you need to push stuff backwards, the more you create a backlog and frustration with the players. Its better to start with small increments and deliver, than vice-versa. Its difficult to assess what you guys/girls are working on back there, while that has many people very excited as well if they knew. 

Implementation in dates - that idea I don't like because it makes commitments done based on either crystal ball or astrology - its either padded so much that someone working efficiently would do it in half time (work will always span whole time allocated on it - one of unwritten laws of universe 😜 ) or will be missed very often. 

Besides - for now they are throwing one "bigger" patch every week - which i think is good enough information that they are working on game.
On one hand giving us information "and we have worked this week on improved graphics and shields" would be nice - and I'm just making random examples here :P- on the other it would most certainly evoke much rage "bUt tHeRe aRe bUgS nEeD fIxInG nOw !1!1!". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...