Jump to content

Lethys

Alpha Tester
  • Posts

    5686
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lethys

  1. Tell me moar Yes, Because generalizations are always correct
  2. If it's worth it, sure. Nothing against the rules there either
  3. think both sides did that considering the following from this very thread memes and salt will flow for sure for some time
  4. talking about staying classy lol. this is hilarious
  5. jop brauchst du (grundsätzlich) keinen plan wie das für die beta ist (bei einem sponsor pack), evtl ist da ein beta key enthalten. ab release muss jeder ein abo bezahlen, ausgenommen kickstarter backer ruby aufwärts, die haben ein lifetime sub
  6. oh that doesn't matter it seems, ppl can still log in and play despite their sub expired
  7. oh it IS against the rules because you can't touch the ball with your hands in soccer. so that analogy STILL is garbage. In DU, there are no balls. just a court with ppl in it and some vaguely shaped balls which ppl have to figure out what to do with them. everyone can play the game as he wishes within the confines of the game - ergo you can be han solo and fight against the empire, be a hermite trader on the outskirts or you can have all kinds of events from different IPs (I personally don't care if it's copyrighted or not - that's up to NQ to decide). but you have to take into account the confines of the game too - here: the pvp zone. RL analogies don't work here either because there are NO severe consequences to any action - I don't get to go to jail nor do I die if I do anything ingame. So I still don't see the point here because those RP guys could've done MUCH to prevent this, but they didn't. It's a friggin game and not RL - preparing such an event with third party crashers in mind IS PART OF IT, because that's what the pvp zone does. ppl could've planned for this. traps, more security, having scouts on scanners around the area and much more - but obviously it's more simple to just offend pvpers on discord and the forums - because THAT'S totally not autistic. I said this for YEARS now and I will continue to say it until NQ finally gets it: YES OFC this is about the EULA and TOS too and if they don't finally get their asses up and get some well written document out there, these kinds of squabbles will always happen. Regarless of how you feel about it or how unfair you deem it that is the only important thing and nothing you or anyone ever says will change the fact that it is explicitly allowed by NQ. This is a fundamental descicion NQ has to make (allow it or not) or create safespaces for those ppl who can't deal with the harsh reality of a game. Plus this isn't about "I can do what i want. Fuck you!" this is about "I can do what I want but so can you - may the better one prepared prevail"
  8. Be better prepared then. And maybe start being smarter.
  9. Hmmmmm they did it in a ffa pvp area. So yes ofc a third party shows up. But I guess you simply cant grasp such a simple concept
  10. If you would use a correct analogy, maybe. That one isn't tho. So have fun!
  11. I don't even play du. But I love chess. And checkers
  12. Awwwww you clearly didn't get that there is no basketball. Nor a soccer Ball. Not your fault I guess
  13. Rly cute how ppl don't want to accept NQs plan from the beginning to have a pvp zone where ppl can be attacked. Gl changing their mind on that one
  14. It was pvp in the pvp zone. Better be prepared next time
  15. Oh you can do that ofc. You can hire mercs and you can have someone watch Scanners for intruders. And you can flee if you see someone approaching. And you can fight them together. Or create a trap. Or just accept that you lost and do better next time because YOU ventured into the pvp zone where you are not supposed to be safe. You know. Emergent gameplay and such. But I guess sheep arent that intelligent to actually play the game.
  16. No you don't. You have the BP. And the experience of building it. You only lose the ship itself. And you can in fact play the game 100% without pvp. So this failing isn't really upon NQ or the game, ppl who venture outside the safezone simply fail to understand what it is about. Also, the dayz example you gave was only to show that you're hypocritical. You're using an "argument" YOU deem good to stomp ppl here with while in fact you yourself do the same thing in another game. Pls point me to the Promotion for du with this event. To me it simply looked like some random guys wanting to show off their cool ships and rp a bit. Where's the Twitter announcement to promote du?
  17. Ah ok, so all the Talk and reasoning about rl stuff IS useless to you too. Good to know that you come up with reasons you yourself don't believe then and everyone can just throw in the bin because they don't mean anything That was never pitched tho. It was always promoted as an open sandbox with some safe zones and the rest pvp area. Ofc such a system leads to what happened here but that was clear from the start. No one really disputed that and I know of a time back in 2014 when we told NQ what this entails. You know what they did. Nothing and ignored it
  18. Oh so you ruined someones life there too, destroying hours of looting on their part. Did you make sure that the same Person picked up his loot again? Or die you not care? Wow this is so hypocritical considering this And now you want us to acknowledge your excuses?.
  19. If they go to the pvp zone they automatically acknowledge that there may be a massacre. Still dont see a problem
  20. Bad analogy lmao that doesnt work here at all Doesnt work either. Its a game. No rl moral involved. Get over it
  21. Sadly no because obviously you did" a dick move" when you play by the rules according to @joaocordeiro
  22. Yup, because killing someone in pvp space clearly is griefing. Going to pvp space and then complaining about dying is irrational and really, really really stupid
  23. Attacking some random ppl in pvp space is "griefing" and a "dick move" Smh. Wow what a bunch of irrational snowflakes
  24. Has been asked years ago too. No response. Guess NQ doesn't want that
  25. ? where is that full article? Isn't this just a copy from over there? I don't get it ?
×
×
  • Create New...