Jump to content

Kuritho

Alpha Tester
  • Posts

    1192
  • Joined

Posts posted by Kuritho

  1. 2 hours ago, DrettTheBaron said:

    SP isn't an actual 'protectorate' as we know it. We had a poll for our name change over a year ago and someone posted this name and it won. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.  And since we're a democratic org we didn't have a choice. We're a fully independent organization with no overlord whatsoever. 

    So SP is basically a defensive alliance pact?

  2. 36 minutes ago, Borb_1 said:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvUTlunPtN8#t=52m

     

    It is interesting to hear some numbers. It is not a lot to hear but it is enough for interest. SC there is so much said, but so little that makes sense to boomerang back to the OPs intention with this thread. On that note, I do not wish to get in the way of discussion on topic, and must bow out.

    Don't let anyone bully you out of a discussion, unless you're part of TU.

  3. 10 hours ago, Borb_1 said:

    Blowing up a ship of 50 crew will always be fun.

     

    But the scale is the real arena not the actual mechanics: A large battle might be strategically decisive on a vaster scale: Economy, territory, pollical, terror and the sanctity of peoples' cherished creations and civilizations. It's for that reason that I think PvP MUST be scaled up also - the biggest scale being it's own specialization.

    You don't understand my statement.

    With DU's current proposed combat mechanics, it'd be a game of rock-paper-scissors.

    Plus, DU probably couldn't handle battles larger than 200 people regardless of what the benchmarks say.

    Even with economics involved, the bigger org should always win if they aren't ran by baboons.

  4. 5 hours ago, Lethys said:

    it depends rly and yes it has to be seen - I agree

     

    but at least in DU you have the possibility to do that with all the limitations in place (no simulated bullets, no twitch pvp, no "real" physics like said in many videos - floating mountains and such - and so on). Which was a killer in SC right from the start

    I still wonder if battles would even be fun in DU. Most of it will be lock-on, and the side with better defenses and attacks (a game of rock-paper-scissors) wins.

    If they add fixed weaponry, then combat would be much more enjoyable.

     

    JC, please do your thing.

  5. 14 minutes ago, Lethys said:

     Min 15

     

    @Warden @Vulcore

     

    FTR did a video in that one too i think 

     

    For me  that's exactly what it is about. I want huge battles and not just 1000 ppl running around on a planet or some bs. 

     

    Oh and I never played SC and probably never will, to me it all sounds....meh ("pvp switch" lol fucking pathetic imho)

    I believe you're mistaken if DU could handle smooth and enjoyable battles at those scales.

    It'd be at least a few years before DU is developed enough.

  6. 1 hour ago, Zorodek said:

    What’s stopping you signing a full alliance with an organisation you have just met, then turning on everyone when you feel like it, nothing, 

    this was written to initiate a relationship, with small but efficient gains, no strings attached, if that relationship blossoms or wilts that is for the future, however we saw too many orgs making binding promises with people they don’t even know, we were not willing to do that so we created this, take it or leave it, if you do not want to sign, then don’t sign it. 

    If you do, then perhaps over time the SoA and whichever orgs sign up can develop great trading agreements or more.

    this is not a over arching agreement, all who sign only agree to deal with SoA, not anyone else who has signed,

     

    This is a 1on1 agreement. Simple to the point. 

     

    Cheers.

    I see.

    My post was kinda a joke, but you should really use readable font. New Times Roman is still probably all the rage after several thousand years.

     

    If you know my pretty well, you should take everything I say with a grain of salt. *queue edgy music*

  7. 3 hours ago, Aaron Cain said:

    Hmm yeah that really is a problem that needs to be solved. You clearly put a lot of thought and effort into this but I don't agree with your solution. I'm too lazy to come up with arguments or think of alternatives myself so Im just going to say. that sucks! (yep think this going to be useful! ;) )

    You sound a bit like an innocent child trying to curse for the first time, but immediately playing for salvation.

    It's totally okay to say "hey that post sucks," but you gotta have actual feedback.

  8. I play BATTLEFIELD V (TM) that is an incredibly fun and enjoying shooter that focuses on combat and historical details while maintaining action-filled gameplay.

    Using the power and efficient Frostbite 3 (TM) game engine, it allows cinematic moments while you make your way through historical sites inspected and curated by historical experts.

    Remember, Battlefield (TM) will never be the same.

  9. You know night vision goggles, right? I sometimes puts knives on the parts where I put my eyes.

    Whenever I see bad and unreadable font, I ram that thing into my sockets so hard that I may've split a few atoms.

    Today, I get to use it.

    ---

    Also, what prevents me from signing this and just turning on everyone? We all know that if everyone had nukes, everybody would be friends.

×
×
  • Create New...