Shaman
-
Posts
169 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Shaman
-
-
6 minutes ago, joaocordeiro said:
Who the hell do you think you are to say that someone who invested 400€ 5 years ago on the project and has been filling up bug reports ever since the bug report the bug report site went online are not welcome and should LEAVE?
Just because someone invested money into the game doesn't mean that they have some special privilege to be toxic now. I don't care how much they invest, if they are being toxic they shouldn't be here.
4 minutes ago, joaocordeiro said:Look, everyone is entitled to give their opinion. Even if it is one very aggressive and disconnected from reality like this one you just gave.
Also, I just love that you are calling me salty when you are the one calling me an aggressive noob who is disconnected from reality. my forum account is very new. my interest and subscription for the game, however, has lasted much longer.
-
6 minutes ago, sHuRuLuNi said:
The word "toxicity" is very often abused in this day and age to silence any and all difference in opinion. No doubt a product of the terrible overly "politically correct" culture that has infested every aspect of media and social networks. I am politically incorrect to the core and will always be. People that in your opinion are "toxic" and "salty" have the right to be so if they so wish. And in my experience most of the "toxic" arguments come precisely from people who actually love the game and would want it to succeed, but are repeatedly let down by irrational decisions on the part of the developers or a complete disregard of any and all suggestions and constructive criticism which could in fact help bring the game to the right track.
These toxic people act like NQ isn't responding to suggestions and criticism, which flat out isn't true. NQ has made some mistakes, there is no denial in that. But these people are also denying the good that NQ have done after the update (nerfing t1 prices, resetting skills, adding a public test server, adding new ways to make money like the mission system, being transparent to the community after the update). This is a one of a kind game, and they won't always get it right. Novaquark have learnt their lesson. I wish we could just leave 0.23 behind us honestly.
-
I understand that some of you are angry at NQ for the latest patch and other various shenanigans. In a way, I agree with you; i'm not picking any sides here. But this criticism has turned into toxicity. Some people believe that it is acceptable to pick apart and beat Novaquark with hate instead of calmly and kindly giving helpful advice on how to make the game improve. Some people believe whenever someone comments a different opinion about the 0.23 update it is their primary objective to thrash back and pour salt on them because 'no one can say nice things about the update'. Some people believe that since the game has turned out slightly different from what they expected they must alert and discourage everyone from playing the game because it is a 'scam*'. Some people believe that just because their experience is ruined they must ruin it for everyone else. And some people just jump on the salt bandwagon even if they have never set up an industry unit in their life.
I will repeat what I just said. I am NOT saying that 0.23 was either a good or bad of an update. If you hate it, that's fine. But people like this are becoming a large excrement deposit on the Dual Universe community. You might have heard that recently a forum conversation got out of hand when an individual exposed a LinkedIn profile of an NQ employee. That is flat out unacceptable. If you are one of the people like this, instead of beating this game and its 50 employees down, just LEAVE. This game would be much better without people like you anyway.
* I have watched the trailers many times now. in my disgustingly baist opinion it's not. (sacré bleu!) misleading? maybe slightly. But let's be honest here, for games that require player interaction, they all are. Take a look at the Starbase trailer for example. Just like Dual's trailer, they both include massive fight sequences, which take up half of the trailer runtime. Sure they are technically possible, but definitely aren't ever gonna happen apart from the rare few events and such.
I know that I will get a wave of salt from this post, just like my previous ones. so please be civil. I won't be responding to any of the people that are hating for the sake of hating or people saying the game is bad without giving at least a bit of constructive criticism. If you feel so inclined, just shout at a wall instead.
- Atmosph3rik, Scavenger, Asirmoth and 2 others
-
5
-
On 2/14/2021 at 4:33 PM, le_souriceau said:
Agree with @XKentX on NQ inconsistency as one of root causes of current mess. Just dig little bit deeper into their history and JCs endless talks to spot a lot of huge "U-turns" (PvP, starting conditions, other critical systems/concepts).
Like this particular interview from 2016 quite a goldmine:
what's this? JC talked about some ideas of what the safe zone would look like to some random journalist which had changed while in development? sacre bleu! Novaquark must be imprisoned for this clear false advertising!
-
1 hour ago, NQ-Naunet said:
Anything in particular you're excited for?
I can't wait for asteroid mining! defending miners from pirates on the asteroid belt seems like a lot of fun!
-
Seems great! cant wait for it to come out.
This communities toxicity is getting out of hand.
in General Discussions
Posted
I don't know if you have seen this Video yet, but NQ seems pretty transparent. As for the mechanics, you can test them on the Public Test Server. If they turn out to be an unreliable source of money, you can suggest it to change, as it is still in development and they are taking suggestions.