Vazqez

Just like the PVP mechanics are broken. Yes, and the mining mechanics are bad 1.The number of free fields should depend on your skill level. 2. respawn of resources should be added in the field occupied by the player. Once every 7 days, the player should be able to re-scan the resources on the field. Such a scan reassigns the resources present on the field. for example T1 x% T2 x% T3 x% T4 x% T5 X% X% - means the chance of drawing a raw material according to its occurrence on a given planet. 3 Schemes are also a bad idea To do something, 1 diagram should be enough But they should add the ability to improve this diagram so that it can be produced more efficiently and cheaper. If NQ wants to, they can. The worst thing is that they want to, but they can't.

Well, that's the point. Except that the current game philosophy does not allow turning off PVP. Currently, you are forced to participate in PVP whether you want to or not. It's possible that the translator isn't working properly, so I'll simplify it. player A turns on PVP player B turns on PVP player C does not enable PVP A and B can fight. A and C can't fight B and C cannot fight. It can't be simpler. Risk and reward are empty words. The only thing that counts is the time spent actively playing.

You're wrong again, my friend. Nothing needs to be balanced. To destroy a ship in PVP, you only need a maximum of 5 minutes It takes 2-3 hours to dig up an asteroid and it doesn't involve pressing the FIRE button. Talking about risk and reward is an empty platitude. What counts is the time actively devoted to gaming.

The conclusion is that pirates are a problem and you have to fly away from the routes. But you wrote that it's only a matter of the number of pirates to completely prevent others from playing, You described the current state of the game, which is poor thanks to the actions of PVP players. I am writing about changing the philosophy of PVP. PVP can take place anywhere, provided that each party agrees to PVP. A PVP player wouldn't have to fly for hours without a xel when PVP could take place anywhere.

Because each light bulb has an independent thermonuclear reactor. That's why it weighs so much. Nevertheless, I will give you a better example which even I cannot explain. From 100 kilograms of raw materials, I make 120 kilograms of products. I'm better than Solomon because he can't pour from an empty cup.

this is not the only problem here. Weight and volume problems are common. Someone doesn't know how to use a calculator. Or they don't want to look at physics and mathematics tables.

And that's where you're wrong, my friend. It's not an option, it's just an ultimatum. Which can be formulated as follows. If you do not agree to PVP, you will not be able to fly the ship to other planets. or you won't dig up any asteroids. Repeating with PVP this option is cheating.

You don't understand again. I don't force NQ to do anything. It's their game, not mine. I'm currently not subscribed to the game and I'm telling you why. I don't agree with the rules of the game, that's why I don't subscribe. I want to help NQ I want to help DU. The reason for the fall of DU will be the rules that are in force now. And I am sure of that.

Well, almost Bad philosophy again What NQ provides needs to be changed, You have accepted the NQ narrative and defend it, and I and all those who have left do not agree with the principles of MQ. NQ rules have no future and lead to collapse. Only a radical change gives you a chance of success. Just like someone wise said Repeating one action and expecting a different result is idiotic.

My friend, you are confusing concepts. You keep telling players that PVP is optional, but it isn't. There is no such thing as PVP content. because it is a definition of activity related to PVP. And if there is no PVP, there is no PVP content. you use contractual terms. the difference in our philosophies is that you divide content into PVP content and non-PVP content. And I say that there is only one content, PVP can take place anywhere, but on one condition. It must be a conscious choice of both sides. (I agree with you here. PVP content will be created in the form of a destroyed ship which will be awarded to the winner) According to the principle, "Be careful who you kill." There's not much that can be done to revitalize this game and I'll also brag about it, I've been a gamer for over 30 years and I've played a lot of games. And believe me, the games on ZX Spectrum were also interesting and addictive.

You don't know that. But it is certain that the current situation and rules will not revive it. A player who, after some time, decides that he wants to try his hand at PVP. He will build a ship and start fighting. The difference is that it will be his conscious decision. And even if he lost and was destroyed, he will stop fighting and focus on rebuilding. And most importantly, don't give up the game.

I have never written anywhere to turn off PVP. I wrote and I write that PVP is to be optional, It's a big difference. As the previous speaker wrote, the DU is connected to life support equipment. Doing nothing is only delaying death.

And this sick ideology destroyed this game. And it was this sick approach that drove the players away. Your philosophy has proven that it takes only a few people to ruin the game for many people/ They should change it, they have nothing to lose anyway. The departure of 40 PVP players will not change anything. But the arrival of 1,000 players who don't want PVP is enough.

Maybe it's the translator's fault that you didn't understand. PVP should be an option, not a requirement. for example. If I want to participate in PVP, I switch my core to PVP mode and fight anyone who has this mode activated. Many people who left were forced to fight PVP.i If they had a choice, they wouldn't do it and stay in the game.

The problem here is that the only reason you want more Quanta is that you don't have as much as you need. The easier they make it for you to earn Quanta the faster you'll get to the point where you have so much Quanta that you have nothing to spend it on. you got it wrong..It's not about more game currency Any reference to the original assumptions of the game is a mistake. These assumptions (principles) did not prove true. otherwise The original rules are not good... it's the bad rules that will be the downfall of the game.