Jump to content

Vifrevaert

Member
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Vifrevaert

  1. DU tweet from April 12th "It's important to note that we did never officially announce our game's compatibility with ShadowPC. Therefore bugs are subject to occur."

     

    Link - 

     

    I'm confident it will get fixed, after all its a 100% reproducible issue, all we can do is wait patiently - I do feel for those who have no alternative PC.

  2. 18 minutes ago, iNFiDeL said:

    This is ridiculous NQ, so when it happens to you bans are thrown to the accused but when it happens to us who cares right?

    And on top of that, all these guys got was some honeycomb and assorted decorative items, not even any decent items - it's ridiculous!

  3. 9 minutes ago, blazemonger said:

    I do have one yes but mostly use it for a handful of shortcuts.. no separate profile..

     

    So you consider this corporate theft and basically abused the trust that was given.. Fair enough I guess but still personally find this behavior abhorrent, especially at this stage . But you be you.. at least the rest of us know what you are made of in game now.

     

    Ah got you, as I started to use the streamdeck I realised its a very personal thing anyway.

     

    And yes I do, it's what I was tasked with by my Org, Vif is just an alt in an alt corp - it was a solid 2 weeks of work I put in

  4. 6 minutes ago, blazemonger said:

    if no rights are set up you would not have access unless you are the owner of the construct.

    If the owner set the construct public then it's just sad you choose this option but it is what NQ allows. (and it will come back to bite them as it is in part their badly set up mechanic that drives this and it will make people leave and give the game a bad rep).

     

    With known exploits in game to allow this even if you have no rights at all, I reserve the right to assume that is what happened

    Unfortunately you can simply change your in game name and no one will know it was you.. I really hope NQ removes that option soon and I do hope NQ implements API options where we can verify applicants to orgs EVE style. If they tolerate this behavior they will need to provide ways to separate the good from the bad.

     

    meanwhile you are on my and our "do not trust .. ever" list.

    I was a member of the Org that was set up as a subdivision to run this factory, you get that it wasnt a random target?

     

    Also I sent you a PM about a week ago about the streamdeck in game, are you still using it?

  5.  

    19 minutes ago, blazemonger said:

     

    There is active and known RMDS exploits which will allow access to containers. Also, by posting this information you pretty much indicate you also used the linked container exploit as this amount of material is near impossible to simply lift off of a planet.. But hanks for the evidence which I have saved and will keep in case it is needed

     

    It was only a matter of time before the exploiters in the game would come out as NQ pretty much wrote them a blank check.

     

    you are part of the problem here, never forget that.

    No RDMS exploit used I had full rights to containers and industry machines - they just hadnt set it up!

     

    I'm unsure what you mean by linked container exploit? I have 2km link container range, I spent a couple of days gathering up 100 odd L containers and burying them underground within link range of the factory on a tile I had claimed in my own name.

     

    After a couple of days of observing login and log out times of the org, alarms were set to get us all up at 7am BST.

     

    I was linked to one container hub of 10 L, as I filled up the hub, org mates moved the contents out into the other stacks of 10 containers and deployed more containers as needed.

     

    I dont understand what about using your link range is an exploit?

×
×
  • Create New...