Archonious

If to speak about me, my main target to find as more abusable thing as possible... and, no, not to use them, remove/change them =)But of course, find new experience and build something nice and useful. But it would be more for Beta. Thanks, Archonious

Pledge for alpha access and get another suit) Thanks, Archonious

Hi, I know everyone is very happy that Kickstarter campaign succeed. But we still need some advertisement. There is the second round of Thunderclap is online and I'm very surprised, why there are only 60 supporters at the moment? Come on guys, we still need support! https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/48071-dual-universe-nearly-funded?locale=en So don't be lazy, help to project now and you will be rewarded with better game quality in future. Thanks, Archonious

He not just never dodges, he never shut up xDDD Person who LOVE to TALK!

https://gaming.youtube.com/watch?v=VVkbdfxiKxM Enjoy, Thanks, Archonious

Are you alpha team member? Do you plan to test the game? Yes?

Don't wait to play, otherwise, you can be disappointed. The alpha version is poor for gameplay and amount of elements. Hope you understand that Thanks, Archonious

NovaQuark, CONGRATULATIONS from RoboTechCorp and personally from me, and be honest FROM ALL COMMUNITY!!! Hope you will reach great success with your project! We all looking forward to seeing this project LIVE! There are a lot of hard work in future, and many of us already want to join to help you! Just keep going forward! We believe in you! Thanks, Archonious

€499,265

NQ, we are waiting for pictures or videos of moment KS reach 500'000!

Bit more than thousand... whup whup!!!

Close this pointless thread as previous one...

Community instantly showed disrespect to that guy. But don't forget, when it repeats and repeats, the reaction would be bigger and bigger. If this guy would be constructive, he would: Suggest how to improve video Suggest what need to be removed/changed Won't write about withdraws Give professional review (if he is prof and care about game)

Ok, you showed your face... I don't like your video, I won't support you... Now we tell you goodbye. You bring nothing except negative. You created a thread full of negative and no any constructive feedback. Don't expect you to be respected for this kind of action. We don't need your excuses. I suggest banning instantly for phrases "You do that, so I have withdrawn my pledge/money".

"Great critics" of games here xDDD Give them ready nice looking game! Give them great video (yeah, spend days for that, take away everything you working on, start to do video)... For those "Great Critics", all videos shows technology, not gameplay! But it is hard to understand for you. Goodbye! Another "I remove my pledge"! Less negative players like you, so that is good!

And we are happy with that. Nobody force you to play. Don't like --> Exit over there.

Seriously, go cry about your EVE on EVE-forums... idiotic comparisons of DAC and PLEX in different game mechanics (payment rewards actualy)...

Don't think it is the reason) It is attempt to offend or self-excuse) Don't know what language I need to know to understand "I like, but it is shity, so I don't like it, because I like it". If somebody understand him, I would be happy to hearn normal explained opinion =) Thanks, Archonious

I have nothing to say more here... I think this guy just lost in his opinions)))) Honestly, it like debate with wall =)

No, source of resources is main factor. Where it came from is the definition factor. You as one of those poor guys starting saying about advantage, which is absolutely formal. Let's ban all organisations and communication, because players sell their time to achieve somdbodies project, which is absolutely equal. Then you start mix basic economy with DAC trade. All I see, you don't even want understand basic and find this basic in other features. Want to ban DAC? Everything need to be banned - organisations, playtime, trade, grinding other players, multi-accounting, even basic chat. BECAUSE EVERYTHING IS SUPPORT P2W (with DAC or without). If do not understand that, it same as do not understand anything. P.S: about example, I would say it is stuoid at all.. player buy ready components, he doesn't spend time... lol, wut? What PlayerA will use as payment? Money! Where did he get it? Grinded/Traded/Stole (spent his time)! Result: Player A grinded money to buy components to create ship and sell it for DAC (time for timeplay).

A. Have no idea what you mean at all. Words on water. B. You don't buy resources, you buy players time (all these resources do not come from nowhere). As I said, don't like this model, want fair model? Let's make 2-3 hour game allowed every day. For everyone. If somebody want to work (grind resources, build ship or something else) for getting 30days sub, go on. If NQ would sell resources, then it would be P2W. Really, need to learn what real P2W mean, not what stupid community think last years (to excuse themselves). Archonious

I don't see any problems. 1. Player A sell his time to player B 2. Player B buy time of player A. Time - this is time spent on resource grinding, crafting or any other. Player B employ player A in other words. As many times, I would say, only one not abusabke and clear model is: Player B can sell DAC as an owner. Player A can use it only. So DAC is out of trade/economy model. It is barter - time to playtime (gold/resources/crafts to 30days sub). That's it, simple! Thanks, Archonious

Everyone who has no money complain about this "they can buy resources". It would be interesting if those who has not so much time start complain about "everyone must play limited amount of hours a week". Why not? P.S: Do not see any P2W model in DAC. Do not plan use them at all. Thanks, Archonious