JohnnyTazer

Nope. its an MMO. a brand new player should take the time to learn the game. Everyone learns at different paces or has more/less time to invest. They can also join an org that can offer them help. It is an MMO. But yes, if you are BRAND new, and solo, they should stay in the safe zone for awhile and learn the game or accept possible consequences venturing out. A new player is never going to be on the same level as a vet with years of experience. But working in groups helps curb that immensely. So once again, people have choices, and thats good for this type of game.

Whos getting griefed? Thats why there is a safe zone, and NQ will no dauntedly not tolerate griefing in the safe zones. But when it comes to the PvP zone.... I shall refer you to the original post.

But no one cares about your morals. This thread isn't about your morals. Yet you keep hijacking it to let everyone know how you are morally superior than people who shoot space ships in a video game.

Im here to show that those actions do not translate to what a person is or how they conduct themselves outside of a video game.

He can't wrap his head around the fact that someone who can kill "innocent" haulers in game, can also be a good person in real life, and want to help inform people to make more accurate decisions.

No, you are here to call people immoral and sadist. Need I pull up the quotes for you?

Please stay on topic. This thread is here to help people understand NQ's stance on PvP and what happens when they enter a PvP zone. I'm doing this to help people make informed decisions on how they spend their money for this game. Which also completely constricts your stance on morals. Because i will happily kill someone 10 times over in the pvp zone. But in real life I like to help people. You on the other hand like to clog up threads calling people immoral and sadists. Ive already reported you for name calling.

Which has been NQ's sentiment since kickstarter. I just wanted to make this thread to help clarify NQ's stance on PVP for people who were unaware. So if they have not purchased a subscription, they can read this and be more informed about what kind of game it is, and what NQ's stance is. Im all for people researching the type of game something it is before they buy so they can make informed decisions on where and how to spend their money on games.

In game consequences, not in real life consequences.

So you are the leader of the moral standard. Your job is to point out that people who shoot people in a video game have low moral values IN REAL LIFE. not just the video game, but are bad people in real life. That doesn't seem absurd to you? I have reported you again. It is dangerous to claim that you possess the power to know who is moral, and what a persons morals are in real life, based on the fact they like to play video games.

It kinda seems like Joacoordeiro is the griefer here, he comes into a forum and game, and wants to change it and ruin our fun. Kind of ironic.

This also begs a good question. If you are so against griefing, and pvpers that have the choice to kill someone. And NQ obviously says thats intended and how they wish to proceed regarding how the pvp zone is handled. And pvpers are sadists. Why are you even here? Go play another game you like. Not every game is for everyone, and there is nothing wrong with that. Why must you bend the will and want the game to only cater to your needs of what is acceptable? Please id love to hear your answer.

Linked this. They do have recourse. Thats what you fail to understand. They have a choice to go back or not. You are not entitled to GO BACK to where you died. But if you do, you have a choice how to. Bring more people and kill them is also a choice. So once again, you are wrong, and you just proved it. I like going over topics like this with you, because you make it so easy.

Opinion.

Opinion.

This is opinion. Not fact. You do realize that right?

Yes, that what you say is only opinion. Not fact. And a misguided opinion at that.

The alternative then is that anything you say is fact right? its only your opinion that matters, and its just that, an opinion. Correct?

Begs the question, if your stance is so definitive, why the need to exaggerate for people to understand? Why can't you just state your opinion or stance and give the reader the respect to understand what you are saying?

No you said 10, which implies 9 and below is ok. Otherwise why say "10" at all? if 10 is meaningless. Which is it? You need to clarify or leave the thread.

But not 9 times. 9 times is ok according to you.

If they back off their stance, there is a high probability they will lose a lot of paying customers. Since a lot of people chose to back this game because of their stance, as quoted by the Dev it was a stance they took over 4 years ago during kickstarter.

I think its quite obvious.

Thats not what you said. You said killing someone 10 times.