Jump to content

ZeroCool

Alpha Tester
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    ZeroCool got a reaction from AccuNut in Naming Planets and Star Systems   
    I agree that changing the name several times could be tricky for mapping purposes, but allowing the name to change a total of 3 times (initial generated name, first claimant and first organization.) should not cause that many issues and would be a way to follow a logical path.  In our universe we have found a potentially habitable planet - Kepler-186f.  Should mankind make a journey to that planet and find it uninhabited, it will likely get a new name given to it by the first settlers, or the people financing the colony.
  2. Like
    ZeroCool got a reaction from Leonis in Naming Planets and Star Systems   
    I agree completely, the headache is just not worth weekly renames because a new faction has taken control or the organization contest winner gets to rename the base planet.  I also want some form of history.  After all, if I am the one that did the work to first find the system, I would prefer to be able to have that reflected in game.  As for renames, it may be better to just have one rename.  The initial generated name and then the first(only) name the planet has - ZC1-152a ----> Arrakis.
×
×
  • Create New...