Jump to content

Leonis

Alpha Team Vanguard
  • Posts

    465
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Leonis

  1. Js isn't Object Orientated (but prototype), at least not when used raw. It's not made to be so (prototype is not object but seem like it).

    LUA comes from C++ and is easily implemented in-game, and is Object Orientated (like C++ and C#). Plus it will let pass way few errors than Js that kind of let everything go through as functions and variables don't have type to begin with. I don't know much about LUA but Js is kind of not user friendly and unstable (even though the syntax is easy, organizing your code can be tough).

  2. It will probably be LUA only.

    I don't know if the in-game customizable screens will be in HTML. And I hope not. I mean it's so cheap, there's no interest if it's not for an in-game net browser imo.

    Surely some hard coded customizable thing would be better (LUA or even without necessary coding for the layout that would be NEAT).

     

    IMO:
    JS is quite flexible but really lacks orthography. I mean come on no one can read it but a mathematician, it just doesn't look easy to work with. Plus it's sometimes "too flexible" as it will let you do errors that can lead the project to be full of it (cool debugging afterwards...).

    C# is just bliss... it's C++ but easier, and is good to begin with, but really less powerful and flexible than C++ that is more customizable. But it also let errors pass the net, so you have some debugging issues where you can't find where the code leak is, or why it occurs.

    C++ let practically no error passing by, they are all detected on build, but that means more work, and is not needed for a small project.

     

    So basically in DU the best would be LUA embedded. JS is for the web and web games sometimes, even though it's not the only option for web games, and I prefer other solutions.

    Long live little LUA and compiled languages.

  3. Cool. But maybe everyone isn't here to go and say hello to each Discord to choose their org. You choose your org, then you can go Discord, or you have an org that has a partnership so you go in another org's Discord to talk. But imagine if everyone does go on every Discord Servers to choose (or to spam). You just facilitates the work for those who wanna spam by providing a list. You don't choose an org for their Discord ... I joined mine there wasn't one.

  4. And yet, I am still the Hill. And thus your King. For now and ever more.

     

    Plus I got me this merc if you are going to argue about it. Nice guy. Left me his card.

     

    I'm getting a little sick of people fighting over me to be honest.

     

    I mean, I'm just a fucking hill.

    No, now you're nothing any more, you vanished. You never existed in fact. :D

  5. Since the hill no longer exists (it was sent back in time, so it exists in the present no longer) I kick over a sandcastle someone else has made and call it the new hill, with me as the king

    Yep. You're king, but it's not the same hill. That way in fact anyone could be king of his own new hill.

  6. Ah I see, in that case there are more culprits then just Solar Secure. I have more then one such invite from more then one source.

    Not sure why people cant just respectfully decline and ignore the remainder of that message though.

    Spamming is when you send an invitation twice to the same person? It becomes spamming that way I think.

  7. Anyway, that was a lot of fuss and what people will learn from it is to reconsider when online-speaking, being MP that can become spamming at some point, or topics scripture that can denote some kind of lack of soul into it, just what I pointed out. For my part I haven't been spammed, so I didn't point that out, but I'm glad a disposition from SS has been taken, considering the spammer. I don't actually blame the spammer, but now he can learn, we all need to learn how to communicate properly, and it's yet a long time before the release of the game now.

  8. But is he wrong though? I have see *SO* much hostility when it comes to newer people. Like the only way to make people learn is to yell and scream and tease till said newbie gets the message. 

     

    I think it would better the community as a whole if instead of being so damn toxic. We actually tried to be decent human beings and kindly help new people understand whats right and whats wrong. 

     

    but more than ever people need to understand this one simple thing- its an online forum. Its not real, it doesnt exist in physical space, you cant touch it, smell it, taste it...SO WHY GET SO WORKED UP OVER IT! 

     

    I understand spam is annoying but lashing out is NOT the proper way to do things. 

     

    Stay calm, stay civilized, and above all. Be professional.

    Agreed. I'm calm yet chill and calculated.

  9. :ph34r: "hate and harmful". What's "harmful" is people that don't want to read or try to comprehend the few arguments of how indistinct the SS org is and how infirm its post to advertising was. I first came on that post (on advertising) to say how it didn't sell the product properly, but apparently some were spammed as I didn't know. Then, because of my (I consider mine here, but I don't know about others') heavy critic, it all went fussy on and on, and not always the way I wanted, that is the constructive, thoughtful way.

×
×
  • Create New...