Jump to content

NorthernHermit

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by NorthernHermit

    DevBlog: Monetization, player happiness and economic viability

    in DevBlog Feedback

    Posted

    First of all... don't know what your problem is!

    You guy have apparently an korean fetish^^

     

    1. For a good game, no dev gonna strave if they use B2P! As example only think that the game gonna cost 60 Euro and that at least 100 000 people buy the game... calculate how much money they gonna have (i repeat only an example, if the game is good they gonna sell more).

     

    2. Servers are not dev's problem! You know what a DEDICATED SERVER is? Only as a little example...

     

    3. You guy seem to have a reality problem. 99% of the B2P games (that you buy and so pay only 1 time) are NOT pay to win... but your so blindly beloved P2P is it at over 90% !!!

     

    4. What contineously pay for to get updates? XD In what kind of reality seriously are you living?

    I have so many games that I bought and that are frequently updates FOR FREE!

     

    5. Don't come again with Korean MMO...  or is this your case... had you ever had this problem? Is it your secret experience from the past that traumatized you? ;)

     

    Look, first of all this thread you have your opinion, I got mine, if you dislike it okay...good but don't come with such a crap like "your korean blablabla".

     

    Live with it, other people have their own opinions!

    Finally someone who think! We all look so dumb next to you now XD And im not even kidding.

    DevBlog: Monetization, player happiness and economic viability

    in DevBlog Feedback

    Posted · Edited by NorthernHermit

    Well im not up for F2P model either, it is worst possible model for this so i am up for B2P because i just need to save few months to get it :) Plus one big con is that only SE and Blizzard only can go with subscription model because they get money from other products so im afraid Sub model on this might flop, especially when people dont need to buy product. So i have proposal: why don't go with same plan than EVE going this month, make players buy (with something like 40-50$) and limit features and with sub they unlock rest of features and after 6 month subscription they can extend their sub state with PLEX like item ?

    DevBlog: Monetization, player happiness and economic viability

    in DevBlog Feedback

    Posted · Edited by NorthernHermit

    Strange, I always preferred subscription models and I never left my real life.

     

     

    Do not deny your addiction and blame the model for it. In WoW, I knew people who logged during the weekends for raids, and later on, I and my arena team logged in 2 days a week, wednesday and friday noon for arena rating advancement.

     

     

    If you are getting addicted easily to things, that's a weakness of yours, not the subscription model's.

    Haven't played WoW since Burning Crusade release week, haven't played EVE since i got disabled, with current incomes i can afford only save like 8 € in MONTH so i can't play this anyway... So for me it is commit life or leave.

    Edit. and i highly doubt this can go Ascent - The Space Game 3 €/month subscription....

    Making a planet into a ship

    in Builder Forum

    Posted

    Well, even if you could. Imagine how much thrust would be required to get something the size of a planet even beginning to move. dodge the fact that if it has a proper orbit you would have to enact enough force to get it to eject said orbit, and after that escape the gravity well of the Star/Object it happens to be orbiting. Yikes  :mellow:

    Maybe build ship inside planet and use mega like gravity generator make it weight like a feather ? lol

×
×
  • Create New...