So the change is welcome if the rest hinted at can be implemented. But and there's always a but, this doesn't fix anything. It creates a class system of have's and have not's. So the market which was a mess to start with, as it was largely irrelvant except for converting mass into quanta to buy the assets you needed, will now still be irrelevant for anyone who isn't poor.
Now is the time to try this but without a fully developed system and even more importantly, a complete lack of a meta system, making careers definable or desirable, we're back at square one.
The game is missing so much and anything, anything, is welcome but this will not lead to the depth required because it's a finite game design loop, not one of infinite variety or viability.
I honestly think this is a clear example of a finger in the dyke of bad game design.
[Discussion] DevBlog: Rebalancing the Universe
in DevBlog Feedback
Posted
So the change is welcome if the rest hinted at can be implemented. But and there's always a but, this doesn't fix anything. It creates a class system of have's and have not's. So the market which was a mess to start with, as it was largely irrelvant except for converting mass into quanta to buy the assets you needed, will now still be irrelevant for anyone who isn't poor.
Now is the time to try this but without a fully developed system and even more importantly, a complete lack of a meta system, making careers definable or desirable, we're back at square one.
The game is missing so much and anything, anything, is welcome but this will not lead to the depth required because it's a finite game design loop, not one of infinite variety or viability.
I honestly think this is a clear example of a finger in the dyke of bad game design.