Jump to content

Schematic group issues


Mncdk1

Recommended Posts

Some schematics are in really over-simplified groups. The most obvious example for me, is Detection Zone L. It's a tiny little electronic doo-dad that apparently needs to take as long, to make a schematic for, as an advanced large engine. That's honestly just stupid.

 

There are probably many other good examples (gates maybe), but generally, items seem to be grouped around their naming schemes. It would make more sense to me, to group things around which machine size is needed to produce something.

 

Please fix the groups. A detection zone L shouldn't be considered a large element.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Other good examples atm could be lights, screens, etc.

 

Vertical Sign L takes a Tier 2 L Element schematic, and it is being crafted in a extra small assembler.

Vertical Light L takes a Tier 2 L Element schematic, and it is being crafted in a small assembler.

Modern Screen L takes a Tier 2 L Element schematic, and it is being crafted in a small assembler.

 

If you look at the input materials of these elements, they are clearly not "L Element" items, they are smalls at best. Vert Light L takes up to 5 of each input material, per element crafted, Modern Screen L is the same, Vert Sign L takes ONE OF EACH input material.

 

Please FIX your broken schematic groupings. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...