Lord Gecko Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 I haven't bought any founder package yet, will most likely purchase the silver soon though. I have a few questions i would love to have answered by someone more informed than me, i could possibly find some of this information if i googled it but tried and didn't really find anything. Do we know if the game will have rotors/pistons like in space engineers. Is the insane flying speed and acceleration we see in some of the trailers actual or just a showcase. As far as i understood there will be vehicle combat in the game, if so, will it work with some voxel destruction or just a health bar. Im generaly mostly interested in making awesome spaceships in an envoyrement where they are usefull, so do we know if the combat favours effective spaceships way more than "good looking"? I realise that we may not have information on everything here but if you know something some answers would be highly apreaciated, thanks you :). Alsan Teamaro 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lethys Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 2 hours ago, Lord Gecko said: Do we know if the game will have rotors/pistons like in space engineers https://trello.com/b/Y6WNMd2S/dual-universe-community-suggestions Rejected for now. 2 hours ago, Lord Gecko said: Is the insane flying speed and acceleration we see in some of the trailers actual or just a showcase That's under NDA, unfortunately. 2 hours ago, Lord Gecko said: As far as i understood there will be vehicle combat in the game, if so, will it work with some voxel destruction or just a health bar. PvP isn't yet implemented, so we have to wait on that one. 2 hours ago, Lord Gecko said: Im generaly mostly interested in making awesome spaceships in an envoyrement where they are usefull, so do we know if the combat favours effective spaceships way more than "good looking"? Well ofc, Performance is always better than just "good looking" in PvP. Oh, and welcome to the forums. GunDeva and Lord Gecko 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Gecko Posted April 16, 2018 Author Share Posted April 16, 2018 14 hours ago, Lethys said: https://trello.com/b/Y6WNMd2S/dual-universe-community-suggestions Rejected for now. That's under NDA, unfortunately. PvP isn't yet implemented, so we have to wait on that one. Well ofc, Performance is always better than just "good looking" in PvP. Oh, and welcome to the forums. Thanks a whole bunch, the answers are really apreaciated, and ty for the welcome to the forums :)) i look forwards to being here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalenLoki Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 21 hours ago, Lord Gecko said: As far as i understood there will be vehicle combat in the game, if so, will it work with some voxel destruction or just a health bar. It's planned to be per-voxel destruction. 19 hours ago, Lethys said: Well ofc, Performance is always better than just "good looking" in PvP. Well, it's not that obvious. There are some games where you can build fairy dragons and they are still effective, and some where you need to follow quite strictly building rules to be competitive. It all depends on game mechanics. Example of first could be Machinecraft, mostly because it uses HP bars. Robocraft also goes in that direction. On the other end there is Crossout and From the Depths. I hope DU will find some nice balance, maybe a bit more towards function over looks. A lot depends on how armour and damage works and how important internal components are. Some mechanics can be also used to encourage certain nice looking aspects. I.e. heat propagation could be used to force players to separate ships into barely connected sections. I.e. engines create a lot of heat but it doesn't harm their performance, thus they are placed in sticking out pods. While generators require low temperature to operate And guns require low temp to initiate charging, but jump to very high ones once fired. Some other mechanics generally dumb down builds into bricks, borg cubes and balls. I.e. physical armour. And some force long cigars. I.e. drag based on frontal surface or star-gates with limited size. Internal layout can be also heavily affected by game mechanics. I.e. if combat-repairs are viable (armour>weapons) and repair tool has short range, then for sure ships will be filled with maintenance corridors. If repair is a long range and can go through walls, you may expect ships filled without any empty space. Same effect could be created by making loading/unloading based on physically moving entire boxes, rather than having pipe that sucks items in-between constructs. Lord Gecko 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hades Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 Hmm, I thought it was a wait and see on voxel destruction. For the same reason they aren’t planning on implementing collisions. Could be mistaken though Lord Gecko 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anopheles Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 On 15/04/2018 at 10:43 PM, Lethys said: https://trello.com/b/Y6WNMd2S/dual-universe-community-suggestions Rejected for now. That's under NDA, unfortunately. PvP isn't yet implemented, so we have to wait on that one. Well ofc, Performance is always better than just "good looking" in PvP. Oh, and welcome to the forums. I intend to make my ships so beautiful that to shoot at them will cause the aggressor to die from shame. The Aesthetic Aegis, if you will. Murmandamus, Atmosph3rik, Kurock and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalenLoki Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 11 hours ago, Hades said: Hmm, I thought it was a wait and see on voxel destruction. For the same reason they aren’t planning on implementing collisions. Could be mistaken though Main reason why they don't want collision damage, is that they don't want kamikaze-like ship designs. It also make things easier for servers, but I think that's side effect. And I think there will be collisions, they just won't cause any damage. Otherwise someone could just fly his ship through the wall of you base/battleship. Would look silly to have entire fleet gathered in one spot, phasing through each other Regarding block destruction - how else could it be done? HP bar for entire base that have just antena sticking out of the ground? Or base that looks small outside, but have stacks of armour underground that multiply it's HP tenfold? Or maybe only dynamic constructs would have HP bar and can fight, while static ones wouldn't be allowed any weapons? Or only elements taking damage, while shots go through voxels without noticing them? Then should they also go through the ground (to prevent single-voxel dirt coverage to be ultimate base armour)? Or maybe indestructible one-voxel armour in general, making all interior devices indestructible? Or simply no CvC at all., and you can freely use nanoformer to make holes for AvA assault? I just don't see any other way. If you do, please share. Lord Gecko 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Gecko Posted April 17, 2018 Author Share Posted April 17, 2018 Thanks a ton again, im pleased they are countering ramming ships, i played a bunch of space engineers.. the combat in that game is just rams and bigger rams with war heads inside them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unown Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 4 hours ago, CalenLoki said: Main reason why they don't want collision damage, is that they don't want kamikaze-like ship designs. It also make things easier for servers, but I think that's side effect. And I think there will be collisions, they just won't cause any damage. Otherwise someone could just fly his ship through the wall of you base/battleship. Would look silly to have entire fleet gathered in one spot, phasing through each other Regarding block destruction - how else could it be done? HP bar for entire base that have just antena sticking out of the ground? Or base that looks small outside, but have stacks of armour underground that multiply it's HP tenfold? Or maybe only dynamic constructs would have HP bar and can fight, while static ones wouldn't be allowed any weapons? Or only elements taking damage, while shots go through voxels without noticing them? Then should they also go through the ground (to prevent single-voxel dirt coverage to be ultimate base armour)? Or maybe indestructible one-voxel armour in general, making all interior devices indestructible? Or simply no CvC at all., and you can freely use nanoformer to make holes for AvA assault? I just don't see any other way. If you do, please share. Static deffences have been confirmed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hades Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 5 hours ago, CalenLoki said: Main reason why they don't want collision damage, is that they don't want kamikaze-like ship designs. It also make things easier for servers, but I think that's side effect. And I think there will be collisions, they just won't cause any damage. Otherwise someone could just fly his ship through the wall of you base/battleship. Would look silly to have entire fleet gathered in one spot, phasing through each other Regarding block destruction - how else could it be done? HP bar for entire base that have just antena sticking out of the ground? Or base that looks small outside, but have stacks of armour underground that multiply it's HP tenfold? Or maybe only dynamic constructs would have HP bar and can fight, while static ones wouldn't be allowed any weapons? Or only elements taking damage, while shots go through voxels without noticing them? Then should they also go through the ground (to prevent single-voxel dirt coverage to be ultimate base armour)? Or maybe indestructible one-voxel armour in general, making all interior devices indestructible? Or simply no CvC at all., and you can freely use nanoformer to make holes for AvA assault? I just don't see any other way. If you do, please share. Yeah I was pretty vague, I meant there would be no damage/destruction on collisions. It wasn’t so there wouldn’t be kamikaze designs, it was simply the servers can’t handle it. If they can, I imagine it will be implemented. We will have to see whether or not there will be voxel destruction or not. You seem to be getting voxel destruction confused with damage with locality in mind. They can still have local destruction without implementing voxel destruction. But either way, we really have no idea. I imagine NQ has a little inkling of an idea, but who knows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unown Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 25 minutes ago, Hades said: Yeah I was pretty vague, I meant there would be no damage/destruction on collisions. It wasn’t so there wouldn’t be kamikaze designs, it was simply the servers can’t handle it. If they can, I imagine it will be implemented. We will have to see whether or not there will be voxel destruction or not. You seem to be getting voxel destruction confused with damage with locality in mind. They can still have local destruction without implementing voxel destruction. But either way, we really have no idea. I imagine NQ has a little inkling of an idea, but who knows ships will bounce off eachother? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hades Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 7 minutes ago, unown006 said: ships will bounce off eachother? AFAIK, but remember... it’s always subject to change. I also doubt they’ll bounce, it’ll be a collision with no consequences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unown Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Hades said: AFAIK, but remember... it’s always subject to change. I also doubt they’ll bounce, it’ll be a collision with no consequences. so hit and stop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hades Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 That’s what I’d assume. But hopefully they’ll be able to optimize that server tech and get voxel destruction and collisions in there. That’s probably wishful thinking though We won’t know for quite some time. Something tells me combat is a ways off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hades Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 That's entirely possible, collisions don't really seem like something that fit in DU anyway. One thing I do like about Star Citizen is they seem to open a lot of different dynamic gameplay opportunities. Standard combat, stealth, EMPs/electrical warfare, and ships "designed" for ramming. It takes a lot of skill but if you line up a Scythe/Glaive correctly their blades can slice through a small/medium sized ship. Kamikaze pilots attacking ships on a landing pad used to be an issue... but they seemed to alleviate that problem by making it harder to reacquire a ship. Even a 15 minute timer on insurance was enough to alleviate the issue. However, ramming and collisions during a space battle adds a whole new dynamic to the fight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hades Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 2 minutes ago, Nanoman said: In DU you get to completely design your own ships. With collision damage that would mean you get to design your own weapons. That's a potential game balance nightmare that I don't think applies to Star Citizen. They design your ships and your weapons. NQ just designs your weapons. True, what you see as a bane I see as a boon. I don't think it fits because Star Citizen is much more of an "arcade" feeling... where ramming is even possible in space flight. We'll have to see as the game develops, but something tells me DU won't have that feeling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hades Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, Nanoman said: This is not my opinion we're talking about I'm just saying that JC has explicitly mentioned this somewhere as (part of) the reason for not wanting collision damage, if I remember correctly. And it makes sense to me. Oh haha, the bane vs boon was purely directed at your opinion of players being able to build their own weapons. That’s a dynamic characteristic to me, not a balancing nightmare. I completely understand NQs stance for not implementing collision damage. In fact, I think I was the one who brought it up that it probably won’t happen. I just think there are possibilities there for deeper gameplay IF it were. If “kamikaze” pilots are the blocker and not server tech, I don’t think they’d be an issue. But that’s NQs call. Something tells me it will be hard to even “kamikaze” in DU haha. But being able to launch a lump of mass at a ground base is dynamic to me. Imagine trying to ward off what seems to be an asteroid hurtling towards your base. Completely new gameplay opportunities Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hades Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 13 minutes ago, Nanoman said: Yes, and it's also a player-built weapon. Precisely what NQ does not want (as far as I know). Do you have a source for this? As that’s a very strong statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0something0 Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 It has been confirmed that ships will take damage when they crash into the ground. I'm assuming that only the ship and not the ground will take damage so people don't use this as a method of getting rid of a large amount of voxels (like a base) quickly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lethys Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 It was definitely mentioned somewhere, forgot too where though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hades Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 What are your thoughts on improving object collision, physics and having mechanical/movable parts within constructs? Like making large custom hangar doors, elevators, lifting cranes etc. NQ-Sophon: There will be no collision physics between constructs, for gameplay reasons (no missile constructs). For hangar doors, we will introduce elements. Now, having subvoxel structures that move is a possibility, technically, but it is really low on the priority list. Maybe in an expansion at some point. Here’s one tidbit I found. I don’t think it’s the exact source you guys are thinking of though. Will continue perusing. This was from a transcript of an AMA Edit: also found this tidbit in the comments section. “Collision damage is one of the most costly feature (calculation-wise) that can be imagined in a voxel-made environment. It is (at least for the moment), not compatible with a massively multiplayer, seamless environment. There are a few games where realistic collision damage system has been implemented. By making this choice, they sacrificed the possibility to have a massively multiplayer feature running smoothly. It was a tough choice, and on our side we opted for the other solution. We know it's not the best for game immersion, and we remain open to all suggestions that could be used as a workaround.” I honestly don’t think their goal is to limit players, rather server instability is the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atmosph3rik Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 If the most effective way of winning a fight is just being able to afford to blow up you and your opponent's ships and then just buy a new one, then that's what most people will do. Especially if they know they're out-skilled or out-gunned. Removing the possibility sounds like the best solution to me. Maybe there could be some kind of slight collision damage though. Because it seems like none at all could be taken advantage of in strange ways we haven't thought of yet also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atmosph3rik Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 Yeah it wouldn't have to be super realistic. Just some kind of deterrent for people using collision as breaks. Ramming probably shouldn't be the most effective way of getting into weapons range either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalenLoki Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 No collision damage between dynamic constructs seems good for gameplay. But I'm a bit worried about how it will work together with lack of any structural integrity. And I don't mean battleship getting stuck on thin antena - that could relatively easy to avoid by shooting it off. I mean ship getting stuck at single voxel, one of many purposeful left floating around the base. Because AFAIK terrain voxels don't need any connection to the earth core to function. So maybe very limited collision damage? Something like remove few (up to 100) voxels on each side at contact point, and apply large breaking force. Repeat no more often than 2 times per second. So it's not terribly useful as weapon, but at least can get rid of floating debris barrier. Or simply make disconnected terrain dynamic, unless it contains X voxels. BTW: "Voxel damage will come after the alpha" (3:00), right now it's shock-wave mechanics (so distance based) damaging only elements. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Vrf50dZrv4&list=PLA_lhIAGheMGtAygniJs25JDsWgxbfk6V&index=3 Hades 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atmosph3rik Posted April 18, 2018 Share Posted April 18, 2018 21 hours ago, CalenLoki said: No collision damage between dynamic constructs seems good for gameplay. But I'm a bit worried about how it will work together with lack of any structural integrity. And I don't mean battleship getting stuck on thin antena - that could relatively easy to avoid by shooting it off. I mean ship getting stuck at single voxel, one of many purposeful left floating around the base. Because AFAIK terrain voxels don't need any connection to the earth core to function. So maybe very limited collision damage? Something like remove few (up to 100) voxels on each side at contact point, and apply large breaking force. Repeat no more often than 2 times per second. So it's not terribly useful as weapon, but at least can get rid of floating debris barrier. Or simply make disconnected terrain dynamic, unless it contains X voxels. BTW: "Voxel damage will come after the alpha" (3:00), right now it's shock-wave mechanics (so distance based) damaging only elements. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Vrf50dZrv4&list=PLA_lhIAGheMGtAygniJs25JDsWgxbfk6V&index=3 That could definitely be a problem, if the only way to damage a voxel is with weapons, people could use a sort of minefield of single voxels as a barrier. It would be frustrating to have to try to target and destroy a single tiny voxel because it's blocking your entire ship. I guess there could be some kind of weapons that are specifically designed to clear a path for your ship. I don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now