Jump to content

sysadrift

Alpha Tester
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from GraXXoR in SHEDDING LIGHT ON A NOVAQUARK INTERNAL DISCUSSION - discussion thread   
    Cool, so as a ship seller, everyone who bought a ship that I worked hard to build will essentially get it for free.  Then after the quanta wipe, I won't be able to make anything back, because everyone already has the ships I sell.  No thanks.
  2. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from Hagbard in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    There's like five people who got rich from exploits.  A wipe would make a very vocal minority (of the already limited number of people who still play) happy, and the rest would leave.  It's basically a big middle finger to everyone who has put in the time and effort since the beginning of beta to build wealth.  Doing a quanta-only wipe would be even worse.  I've made money by selling ships.  If you wipe the quanta but let them keep the ships, they they basically got them for free, and I (and every other ship seller) gets screwed. 
  3. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from Okivash in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    There's like five people who got rich from exploits.  A wipe would make a very vocal minority (of the already limited number of people who still play) happy, and the rest would leave.  It's basically a big middle finger to everyone who has put in the time and effort since the beginning of beta to build wealth.  Doing a quanta-only wipe would be even worse.  I've made money by selling ships.  If you wipe the quanta but let them keep the ships, they they basically got them for free, and I (and every other ship seller) gets screwed. 
  4. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from kulkija in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    There's like five people who got rich from exploits.  A wipe would make a very vocal minority (of the already limited number of people who still play) happy, and the rest would leave.  It's basically a big middle finger to everyone who has put in the time and effort since the beginning of beta to build wealth.  Doing a quanta-only wipe would be even worse.  I've made money by selling ships.  If you wipe the quanta but let them keep the ships, they they basically got them for free, and I (and every other ship seller) gets screwed. 
  5. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from decom70 in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    Did you watch the video?  They did discuss what happens when you don't pay the taxes.  For two weeks, the tile becomes "inactive" where industry and mining units won't work.  After that, the TU is deleted and the tile becomes available.  The only thing that wasn't clear (because they haven't decided yet) is what happens to constructs on that tile. 
     
     
    Pretty wild speculation given that they haven't even finalized how much the taxes will be.
     
     
    Oh good, another ridiculous "wiper" who's mad that other people have more quanta then them. 
     
     
  6. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from Novean-119644 in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    There's like five people who got rich from exploits.  A wipe would make a very vocal minority (of the already limited number of people who still play) happy, and the rest would leave.  It's basically a big middle finger to everyone who has put in the time and effort since the beginning of beta to build wealth.  Doing a quanta-only wipe would be even worse.  I've made money by selling ships.  If you wipe the quanta but let them keep the ships, they they basically got them for free, and I (and every other ship seller) gets screwed. 
  7. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from Tional in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    There's like five people who got rich from exploits.  A wipe would make a very vocal minority (of the already limited number of people who still play) happy, and the rest would leave.  It's basically a big middle finger to everyone who has put in the time and effort since the beginning of beta to build wealth.  Doing a quanta-only wipe would be even worse.  I've made money by selling ships.  If you wipe the quanta but let them keep the ships, they they basically got them for free, and I (and every other ship seller) gets screwed. 
  8. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from CoyoteNZ in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    There's like five people who got rich from exploits.  A wipe would make a very vocal minority (of the already limited number of people who still play) happy, and the rest would leave.  It's basically a big middle finger to everyone who has put in the time and effort since the beginning of beta to build wealth.  Doing a quanta-only wipe would be even worse.  I've made money by selling ships.  If you wipe the quanta but let them keep the ships, they they basically got them for free, and I (and every other ship seller) gets screwed. 
  9. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from Dracostan in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    There's like five people who got rich from exploits.  A wipe would make a very vocal minority (of the already limited number of people who still play) happy, and the rest would leave.  It's basically a big middle finger to everyone who has put in the time and effort since the beginning of beta to build wealth.  Doing a quanta-only wipe would be even worse.  I've made money by selling ships.  If you wipe the quanta but let them keep the ships, they they basically got them for free, and I (and every other ship seller) gets screwed. 
  10. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from hdparm in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    There's like five people who got rich from exploits.  A wipe would make a very vocal minority (of the already limited number of people who still play) happy, and the rest would leave.  It's basically a big middle finger to everyone who has put in the time and effort since the beginning of beta to build wealth.  Doing a quanta-only wipe would be even worse.  I've made money by selling ships.  If you wipe the quanta but let them keep the ships, they they basically got them for free, and I (and every other ship seller) gets screwed. 
  11. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from Haunty in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    Did you watch the video?  They did discuss what happens when you don't pay the taxes.  For two weeks, the tile becomes "inactive" where industry and mining units won't work.  After that, the TU is deleted and the tile becomes available.  The only thing that wasn't clear (because they haven't decided yet) is what happens to constructs on that tile. 
     
     
    Pretty wild speculation given that they haven't even finalized how much the taxes will be.
     
     
    Oh good, another ridiculous "wiper" who's mad that other people have more quanta then them. 
     
     
  12. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from CoyoteNZ in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    Did you watch the video?  They did discuss what happens when you don't pay the taxes.  For two weeks, the tile becomes "inactive" where industry and mining units won't work.  After that, the TU is deleted and the tile becomes available.  The only thing that wasn't clear (because they haven't decided yet) is what happens to constructs on that tile. 
     
     
    Pretty wild speculation given that they haven't even finalized how much the taxes will be.
     
     
    Oh good, another ridiculous "wiper" who's mad that other people have more quanta then them. 
     
     
  13. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from Tional in INSIDE NOVAQUARK: DEMETER EDITION - Discussion Thread   
    Did you watch the video?  They did discuss what happens when you don't pay the taxes.  For two weeks, the tile becomes "inactive" where industry and mining units won't work.  After that, the TU is deleted and the tile becomes available.  The only thing that wasn't clear (because they haven't decided yet) is what happens to constructs on that tile. 
     
     
    Pretty wild speculation given that they haven't even finalized how much the taxes will be.
     
     
    Oh good, another ridiculous "wiper" who's mad that other people have more quanta then them. 
     
     
  14. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from kulkija in THE FUTURE OF DU COMMUNITY FEEDBACK Q&A - Discussion Thread   
    On that last point about a wipe, please do not take the incessant ranting of a very vocal minority as a legitimate request from the community.  There's probably about >1% of players who actually want that, most of them new. 
  15. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from AlexRingess in THE FUTURE OF DU COMMUNITY FEEDBACK Q&A - Discussion Thread   
    On that last point about a wipe, please do not take the incessant ranting of a very vocal minority as a legitimate request from the community.  There's probably about >1% of players who actually want that, most of them new. 
  16. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from DropNod in THE FUTURE OF DU COMMUNITY FEEDBACK Q&A - Discussion Thread   
    On that last point about a wipe, please do not take the incessant ranting of a very vocal minority as a legitimate request from the community.  There's probably about >1% of players who actually want that, most of them new. 
  17. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from Eviltek2099 in THE FUTURE OF DU COMMUNITY FEEDBACK Q&A - Discussion Thread   
    On that last point about a wipe, please do not take the incessant ranting of a very vocal minority as a legitimate request from the community.  There's probably about >1% of players who actually want that, most of them new. 
  18. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from admsve in THE FUTURE OF DU COMMUNITY FEEDBACK Q&A - Discussion Thread   
    On that last point about a wipe, please do not take the incessant ranting of a very vocal minority as a legitimate request from the community.  There's probably about >1% of players who actually want that, most of them new. 
  19. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from admsve in DEVBLOG: THE FUTURE OF DU PART ONE: REFINING OUR PROCESSES - Feedback Thread   
    The effort to communicate more and involve the community in the development process is refreshing.  One thing that I think may help is if the snapshot used in the PTS was refreshed more frequently.  Myself and probably others want to test if the stuff they are currently working on will still work with the new changes.  Also despite what you may hear from the vocal minority, we don't need a wipe.  That would do far more harm than good. 
  20. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from CaptainKork in DEVBLOG: THE FUTURE OF DU PART ONE: REFINING OUR PROCESSES - Feedback Thread   
    The effort to communicate more and involve the community in the development process is refreshing.  One thing that I think may help is if the snapshot used in the PTS was refreshed more frequently.  Myself and probably others want to test if the stuff they are currently working on will still work with the new changes.  Also despite what you may hear from the vocal minority, we don't need a wipe.  That would do far more harm than good. 
  21. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from SpaceBird in DEVBLOG: THE FUTURE OF DU PART ONE: REFINING OUR PROCESSES - Feedback Thread   
    The effort to communicate more and involve the community in the development process is refreshing.  One thing that I think may help is if the snapshot used in the PTS was refreshed more frequently.  Myself and probably others want to test if the stuff they are currently working on will still work with the new changes.  Also despite what you may hear from the vocal minority, we don't need a wipe.  That would do far more harm than good. 
  22. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from Vifrevaert in DEVBLOG: THE FUTURE OF DU PART ONE: REFINING OUR PROCESSES - Feedback Thread   
    The effort to communicate more and involve the community in the development process is refreshing.  One thing that I think may help is if the snapshot used in the PTS was refreshed more frequently.  Myself and probably others want to test if the stuff they are currently working on will still work with the new changes.  Also despite what you may hear from the vocal minority, we don't need a wipe.  That would do far more harm than good. 
  23. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from Atmosph3rik in DEVBLOG: THE FUTURE OF DU PART ONE: REFINING OUR PROCESSES - Feedback Thread   
    The effort to communicate more and involve the community in the development process is refreshing.  One thing that I think may help is if the snapshot used in the PTS was refreshed more frequently.  Myself and probably others want to test if the stuff they are currently working on will still work with the new changes.  Also despite what you may hear from the vocal minority, we don't need a wipe.  That would do far more harm than good. 
  24. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from SGCamera_Beta in [Discuss] Dev Blog: The New DRM System   
    For me, this is the most important missing feature:
    We need a way for a creator to be able to transfer their “creatorship” to another player/org. Not only that, but there should be an RDMS flag for editing DRM protected Lua on a construct.  Our use case is that we have a number of Lua developers in our org who work collaboratively on a ships code.  With the current state, and proposed solutions, we'd need to make every developer a legate, or remove DRM altogether in order to work the way we have.  
  25. Like
    sysadrift got a reaction from Arialine in [Discuss] Dev Blog: The New DRM System   
    For me, this is the most important missing feature:
    We need a way for a creator to be able to transfer their “creatorship” to another player/org. Not only that, but there should be an RDMS flag for editing DRM protected Lua on a construct.  Our use case is that we have a number of Lua developers in our org who work collaboratively on a ships code.  With the current state, and proposed solutions, we'd need to make every developer a legate, or remove DRM altogether in order to work the way we have.  
×
×
  • Create New...