Jump to content

Welcome to Dual Universe
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. This message will be removed once you have signed in.
Login to Account Create an Account
Photo

What value does sovereign territory have in an infinite universe?

infinite universe eve online territory politics war

  • Please log in to reply
34 replies to this topic

#1
Tsyolin

Tsyolin

    Newbie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
Hi all, I've been a long time lurker here and decided to finally register to ask a question that's been bothering me. I understand that there's a lot, if not most of this game that isn't quite set in stone. There's a lot of questions I want to ask but I know most of then can't really be answered yet. What I do want to ask is about the so called "persistent universe".

Now in the F.A.Q. it's a little vague about how it describes the way the universe functions. It is implied that it is infinite but it never directly says it either so I'm left unsure about how that will all work. I'm pretty interested in the political concepts that are being looked at. It seems to be possibly derivitve of EVE Politics which is to me a good thing, politics in EVE are probably the most interesting part about that game. However it should be know that often times what drives political conflicts and wars in EVE and even in our own history is landgrabs, there's always some peice of land or territory that somebody else wants to get their hands on.

My question is that if there is no limit to how much territory there can be, what value does it even really have? I've read plenty already and I see it being said that it will take a long time to even claim territory and try to spread out amongst the stars which is all well and good but let's be real here nobody outside the dev team really has anyway to measure that. In EVE territory is limited, and with low supply comes high demand and spectacular conflicts ensue as a result. If it's easy to just explore some more and get more land why would anybody fight over it?

Obviously the idea of a never ending MMO universe sounds cool but is it really the best thing to do? Or will politics not really matter as much in this game. If this question has already been answered then I apologize, I searched but didn't find anything anywhere.

Tl;Dr basically what the title says

#2
Warden

Warden

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 421 posts
  • Sapphire Founder
I think infinite is misleading. No game environment is "infinite", at least not these 3D sandbox worlds. I like to compare with Minecraft. Roughly a few Earth sizes large, you eventually hit a generation or processing limit and enter the "twilight zone" before it just fails.

Instead I would think of a potentially very large virtual world space that we need, assuming single-shard idea. And with this I don't necessarily see a broad devaluation of space or territory. There can be plenty of reasons, still. A good location, a city or settlement, certain resources, etc.

You could find or make some of this elsewhere, but some would ask: why, if you can try to take it?

Posted Image


#3
Velenka

Velenka

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 302 posts
  • LocationUtah, USA
  • Ruby Founder

Firstly, expansion into the universe beyond the first planet will take months to begin, and will take weeks to travel between systems by FTL initially.

 

After that, I don't think being infinite or not matters in this context. I think it is a question of the path of least resistance and of value. Would an organization have an easier time expanding further out into the universe or to take over another territory? Due to the time involved, it's probably the latter.

 

Or perhaps there's value in territory because of resources or strategic location. The value may even come from constructs which exist on an otherwise worthless territory. Territories that aren't required to expand into or that have no resources or other attributes could be called worthless. They may as well not exist. But other organizations may find value in that territory for other reasons.

 

Lastly, JC Baillie has stated that the point of procedural generation isn't to be infinite, but rather to generate the content in the first place or something to that effect.


Under construction


#4
DaSchiz

DaSchiz

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 436 posts
  • Silver Founder

There will always be people who want to simply take over other people's stuff.

 

Plus I have a feeling that planets closer to the Ark starting planet will see much action.  Stargates have a range or certain max distance they can work within.

 

The issue with Eve is that being finite you have very few organizations that can live in null.  Newer organizations don't really have much of a chance to grab a piece of it from established organizations.  IMO this makes it pretty stale.



#5
GalloInfligo

GalloInfligo

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 351 posts
  • LocationMichigan
  • Gold Founder

I could see it also happening because of over growth, say hex A is owned and all the other ones around it are as well all by different organizations.  when the city or whatever is built in A needs to expand it might need to fight to take over an adjacent hex.

 

I do agree with your point though, once we are all space faring, why not just explore. and move else where. a planet for everyone.  I can see big, hungry organizations, letting the smaller ones do the work then swoop in to take it over.  because the other organization already built the stargate etc...


Posted Image


"Come on, you sons of bitches! Do you want to live forever?"

GySgt. Daniel J. "Dan" Daly, USMC
near Lucy-`le-Bocage as he led the 5th Marines' attack into Belleau Wood, 6 June 1918


#6
Aetherios

Aetherios

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 816 posts
  • LocationDrifting through deep space in a petite cottage.
  • Gold Founder

"Infinite space is infinite, theoretically in games, but for organisations, land is limited. It isn't going to easy to develop and build on a land, just to have someone else take it over by force and then move on in search of greener pastures. It will be possible and easy for smaller organisations and in the early stages of the game, but as organisations grow, the game develops and you're forced to abandon territory in search of others, it gets frustrating and outright infuriating. As DaSchiz has noted, some people have no interest in exploring, they simply take what they want from others. Then it becomes your duty to decide whether to give it up and look to new lands or to defend what's yours and risk losing all.

 

Some explorers will always be explorers and some organisations may base their income simply off exploring fertile lands and selling them at a price. But there's a limit to which an empire can expand and it is the duty of the leaders to find that optimal territory size and stick to it. Explore too far and the empire will crumble, keep too little of a territory and you will face resource problems among others. To the open mind of the explorer, space is infinite, but to organisations and people like us, space is very, very limited.

"


  • Cybrex, Sketch, MechMerchant and 3 others like this

#7
GalloInfligo

GalloInfligo

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 351 posts
  • LocationMichigan
  • Gold Founder

"Infinite space is infinite, theoretically in games, but for organisations, land is limited. It isn't going to easy to develop and build on a land, just to have someone else take it over by force and then move on in search of greener pastures. It will be possible and easy for smaller organisations and in the early stages of the game, but as organisations grow, the game develops and you're forced to abandon territory in search of others, it gets frustrating and outright infuriating. As DaSchiz has noted, some people have no interest in exploring, they simply take what they want from others. Then it becomes your duty to decide whether to give it up and look to new lands or to defend what's yours and risk losing all.

 

Some explorers will always be explorers and some organisations may base their income simply off exploring fertile lands and selling them at a price. But there's a limit to which an empire can expand and it is the duty of the leaders to find that optimal territory size and stick to it. Explore too far and the empire will crumble, keep too little of a territory and you will face resource problems among others. To the open mind of the explorer, space is infinite, but to organisations and people like us, space is very, very limited.

"

Thats pretty much how I see it going as well.

 

sorry out of likes!


  • Aetherios likes this

Posted Image


"Come on, you sons of bitches! Do you want to live forever?"

GySgt. Daniel J. "Dan" Daly, USMC
near Lucy-`le-Bocage as he led the 5th Marines' attack into Belleau Wood, 6 June 1918


#8
Aetherios

Aetherios

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 816 posts
  • LocationDrifting through deep space in a petite cottage.
  • Gold Founder

Thats pretty much how I see it going as well.

 

sorry out of likes!

"That's a like in itself. It is much appreciated."



#9
CaptainTwerkmotor

CaptainTwerkmotor

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3905 posts
  • LocationRaptor Squad HQ
  • Gold Founder

"Infinite space is infinite, theoretically in games, but for organisations, land is limited. It isn't going to easy to develop and build on a land, just to have someone else take it over by force and then move on in search of greener pastures. It will be possible and easy for smaller organisations and in the early stages of the game, but as organisations grow, the game develops and you're forced to abandon territory in search of others, it gets frustrating and outright infuriating. As DaSchiz has noted, some people have no interest in exploring, they simply take what they want from others. Then it becomes your duty to decide whether to give it up and look to new lands or to defend what's yours and risk losing all.

 

Some explorers will always be explorers and some organisations may base their income simply off exploring fertile lands and selling them at a price. But there's a limit to which an empire can expand and it is the duty of the leaders to find that optimal territory size and stick to it. Explore too far and the empire will crumble, keep too little of a territory and you will face resource problems among others. To the open mind of the explorer, space is infinite, but to organisations and people like us, space is very, very limited.

"

The point is, that empires will have their hubs, capitals, etcetera and querry worlds. Imperialism costs. Storeing those minerals will be a logistics thing. To store minerals, you need space, and that space better not be near the borders to a hostile faction That's the point of sovereignities. Also, trading routes. If you have a strategic point, you'll be able to add tolls to it. Those tolls add up to more money for your faction.

A capital of a faction located far behind enemy lines, is the kind of place where the builders and industrialists will have fun in tournaments for PvP, while a shitstorm will be raging in the borders, were PvPers wil lbe clashing to keep borders safe.


Ah.... they say video games are art, and I do like it when art imitates
 life. :P


  • Dunbal likes this

#10
ostris

ostris

    Novark Citizen

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 119 posts
  • LocationAustin Texas
  • Gold Founder

I agree with most of the others in this thread that land will perhaps not be all that valuable but what you put on that land will be. I also wonder if they plan on having most land not have a large amount of resources but some area with very dense resources. This would create a high amount of value for certain pieces of land as mines.



#11
IMULTITALENTED

IMULTITALENTED

    Newbie

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
This whole idea of hexes in game on one planet sounds kinda dumb. You have a whole Galaxy with billions of planets. Why are the organizations on one planet? If this game and Elite Dangerous could be put together it would be the greatest Game EVER!!

#12
Anonymous

Anonymous

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 259 posts
  • LocationAustralia
  • Gold Founder

Reality check.

 

Using our one REAL measure (Earth):

 

Surface area: 501,000,000 km2

 

Dry bits (usuable "territory"): 139,870,000 km2 or about 29.2% of the total surface area.

 

Arable land - example only - obviously mining is different): About 55,948,000 km2 or about 10 of the total surface area...

 

And then to refine it further (for instance) when it comes to human settlement, historically something like 80% of all human settlement was within walking distance of salt.

 

Key takeaway - there is a crap ton of "territory" to be had in a setting like DU - you may consider this "infinite". But only (if modelled right) a very small percentage of that territory will be usable in some way and thus matters - Sovereign Territory therefore is really actually "finite" and always will be.

 

Sovereign Territory isn't about how much km2 you control - it's about WHAT is in the territory you control, or what controlling that territory strategically gives you access to or control over.


  • Aetherios, Kuritho, Velenka and 1 other like this

#13
ShadowLordAlpha

ShadowLordAlpha

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 228 posts
  • LocationEarth (maybe)
  • Emerald Founder

expanding will also be very expensive at least until something is set up while just bringing in something like mining equipment and drilling a hole then getting out is decently cheap compared to setting up a whole city. also yes you will probably need a city or at least some kind of infrastructure as you need fuel along with possibly food energy and maybe some other things which is far easier to come by when you live near other players. so there are things that drive people apart and to expand but also other factors that cause them to group together and that territory that they group together on will be valuable to organizations.


Posted Image

SilverLight Industries | Now Hiring | Organization Link


#14
Aurenian

Aurenian

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts

I think no matter how far out people go, more powerful factions will be waging war to keep the in game market focused on the starting worlds, where they have the most influence.



#15
Warden

Warden

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 421 posts
  • Sapphire Founder

This would or could in turn however result in niche markets far out - as alternative or competition to a potential "stranglehold" others may have over the "core areas".

 

Whether socially or economically, I assume branching or moving out will still be useful or viable. With demand comes supply, or the other way around.


Posted Image


#16
VioletBannana

VioletBannana

    Novark Citizen

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 218 posts
  • Gold Founder

Choosing to bulld a new outpost or not is a logistics thing, presumably you are going to need to build refineries and factories to build new constructs eventually the time and risk of pirates when traveling from mining sites to refineries will make it worth the cost of establish outposts. Defending those refineries, factories, storage areas and social spots will be a big job for a large organisation. Defending ever large volumes will be tricky.


Background: Software Engineer
Interests: Programming, Politics, Social

Roles: Town and city planning, Economy building


#17
devu

devu

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 119 posts
  • LocationLondon
  • Gold Founder

Mentioned that in other thread already but again the same point would be valid here. 

If Dual will be well balanced based on energy requirements there is nothing to worry about.

 

The answer to your question will come down to one thing.

 

Work out how much energy/resources you need to acquire land vs expand.

If expansion will be hard enough that nobody will reach ends of galaxy in a lifetime it is safe to call this game infinite.

If you need a year or so to reach next solar system I think we will never run out of territorial wars ;)

 

I bet many nations we know on Earth given a chance to move within a year to next solar system would leave our planet many centuries ago :D


Posted Image

#18
VioletBannana

VioletBannana

    Novark Citizen

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 218 posts
  • Gold Founder

Its confirmed the NQ want to restrict the size of explorable space exactly for this reason.


Background: Software Engineer
Interests: Programming, Politics, Social

Roles: Town and city planning, Economy building


#19
Fitorion

Fitorion

    Novark Citizen

  • Alpha Team Vanguard
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 197 posts
  • Iron Founder

How valuable is it in real life?  it's just the same.

 

 

But we can't go to the stars you say... we can't even get off our planet practically...

 

Yep.  Just like in Dual Universe it'll take time and effort and many people working together to travel...  The limit is practicality.  

 

This won't be a free flying go anywhere at any time in no time game.  The same things that prevent you from loading up your car and driving across a continent on a whim in real life are the same things that will stop you from going too far in Dual Universe. 



#20
Vorengard

Vorengard

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 80 posts
  • Gold Founder

Even if the universeis endless, and it's not hard to get around (neither of which are necessarily true according to the devs), there are still plenty of economic reasons why people will want to stay centralized. You can't make money if there's nobody to sell anything to. You'd also have to be entirely self-sufficient in terms of rare resources, construction, even new blueprints. You'd have to design and build everything yourself. Not to mention you'd have a real hard time getting any more recruits, as they'd have to travel all they way out to wherever you are to be worth anything. No, I think people will stay centralized because it will be difficult not to be close to the Hub, which will probably be the Arkship.

 

To use the EVE example, the closer you get to the trade hubs, the more people there are, Jita especially. Even null-sec entities that base their existence on being on the fringe of space still live as close to the core as they can. Not many alliances have their base of operations out in Cobalt Edge, or the back end of Period Basis, do they? Even if they own sov there, that's mostly for ratting space, and the rest of the time they fart around the high-traffic areas like everyone else.


  • Dunbal likes this





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: infinite, universe, eve, online, territory, politics, war

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users